In administrative law and public governance, distinct institutional mechanisms exist to check bureaucratic excesses and enforce civil service accountability. Match each administrative control instrument or supervisory body on the left with its corresponding legal basis or operational method on the right:
- Public Accounts CommitteeLegislative post-audit examination of departmental accounting officers based on reports submitted by the Auditor-General.
- Writ of MandamusJudicial order issued by a court of law compelling a public officer to perform a mandatory statutory function.
- Public Complaints CommissionExtrajudicial Ombudsman mechanism providing accessible investigation into administrative injustice, red tape, and official arbitrariness.
- Public Service RulesInternal executive regulations establishing official protocol, administrative procedures, conditions of service, and disciplinary sanctions.
Answer
Public Accounts Committee matches Legislative post-audit examination based on Auditor-General reports; Writ of Mandamus matches Judicial order compelling performance of a statutory duty; Public Complaints Commission matches Extrajudicial Ombudsman mechanism investigating administrative injustice; Public Service Rules match Internal executive regulations establishing administrative procedures and discipline.
Each institutional mechanism is correctly mapped to its specific oversight function: Legislative control over civil service finance is executed by the Public Accounts Committee examining audit reports; Judicial control over neglected statutory obligations is enforced by a Writ of Mandamus; Extrajudicial investigation into administrative abuse is provided by the Public Complaints Commission; and Executive internal discipline is governed by the Public Service Rules.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Civil Service Control Mechanisms
Estimated Time:2m 0s