A logistics company purchased a used delivery van from a commercial vehicle dealer. Two months after the purchase, a microfinance bank legally repossessed the vehicle because it was encumbered by an undisclosed prior chattel mortgage created by the previous owner. Under the Sale of Goods Act, what primary legal remedy can the logistics company pursue against the dealer?
- Claim financial damages for breach of an implied warranty of quiet possession.Answer
- BRepudiate the contract and immediately reject the vehicle for breach of an implied condition.
- CDeclare the transaction void ab initio and seek criminal sanctions against the lending bank.
- DForfeit all legal remedies against the seller under the strict application of caveat emptor.
Answer
Claim financial damages for breach of an implied warranty of quiet possession.
Under the Sale of Goods Act, every contract of sale contains implied warranties that the buyer will enjoy quiet possession of the goods and that the goods are free from any undisclosed charge or encumbrance. When the vehicle was repossessed due to a prior undisclosed lien, the seller breached these statutory warranties. The legal remedy for breach of a warranty is an action for financial damages to compensate the buyer for the loss suffered.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Implied Warranties under the Sale of Goods Act (Quiet Possession & Freedom from Encumbrances)
Estimated Time:1m 0s