Question

Difficulty: MediumTypes and Classification of Constitutions

A constitutional document classified as written is inherently rigid, as any written constitution automatically requires a complex or special legislative procedure to be amended.

Answer: Answer

Answer

False. A written constitution refers to its formal codification in a single document, whereas rigidity concerns the legal procedure required for amendment. Codification does not automatically make a constitution rigid.
The statement is false because 'written' describes a constitution's physical codification in a single document, while 'rigid' describes a strict amendment process requiring special procedures. The two concepts represent separate classification criteria.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Distinguish between constitutional classification criteria.
Classification by form separates constitutions into written (codified) and unwritten (uncodified), while classification by amendment method separates them into rigid and flexible.
Different classification schemes measure distinct structural characteristics of a constitution.
2
Evaluate the relationship between written form and constitutional rigidity.
While written constitutions are frequently rigid, the format itself does not mandate a complex amendment process. A written constitution can be altered by a simple parliamentary majority if its text permits.
Rigidity depends strictly on specific constitutional clauses governing amendments, not merely on whether the text is codified.

Key Concept

Classification of Constitutions: Written vs. Rigid
Rate this question