Political scientists classify constitutions using distinct criteria based on document codification and legal amendment mechanisms. Which of the following scenarios accurately illustrates that a constitution can be codified (written) while remaining legally flexible?
- A sovereign state maintains its fundamental rules in a single compiled document, but allows any constitutional clause to be altered by parliament using standard law-making procedures requiring a simple majority vote.Answer
- BA sovereign state enacts its governing structure into a single written text, which inherently prevents the legislature from amending any provision without executing a mandatory national referendum.
- CA unitary government delegates legislative duties to regional assemblies through statutory enactment, thereby legally transforming its written charter into a rigid federal constitution.
- DA nation bases its legal framework primarily on unwritten conventions, which automatically renders its constitutional system rigid due to reliance on entrenched legal traditions.
Answer
A constitution is classified as written (codified) if its fundamental principles are embodied in a single document, and flexible if its provisions can be amended through the standard legislative process with a simple majority. Thus, a state with a single written text whose clauses can be modified by ordinary simple majority votes operates under a written yet flexible constitution.
The classification of a constitution as written (codified) is determined by whether its core principles exist within a single formal text. Its classification as flexible depends on whether it can be amended via ordinary legislative procedures by a simple majority. Therefore, a state that codifies its rules in a single text while allowing amendments through standard simple majority legislation demonstrates a written yet flexible constitution.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Classification of Constitutions: Written vs Unwritten and Rigid vs Flexible Criteria
Estimated Time:1m 30s