A business owner acquired industrial baking machinery under an agreement requiring an initial deposit of and twelve equal monthly installments of . After successfully paying eight installments, the buyer defaulted on the remaining payments. If this transaction is legally classified as a deferred payment scheme rather than a hire purchase contract, which of the following statements correctly describes the vendor's legal rights regarding the machinery and the outstanding balance?
- The vendor cannot repossess the machinery because title passed immediately to the buyer upon delivery, but the vendor can sue the buyer in court to recover the unpaid debt of .Answer
- BThe vendor has the legal right to repossess the machinery immediately and retain all previous payments totaling as rental compensation.
- COwnership automatically reverts to the vendor upon default, requiring the vendor to refund all previous installments before taking back the machinery.
- DThe vendor may repossess the machinery without a court order, provided the repossessed equipment is sold at an auction to recover only the unpaid balance of .
Answer
The vendor cannot repossess the machinery because title passed immediately to the buyer upon delivery, but the vendor can sue the buyer in court to recover the unpaid debt of .
In a deferred payment agreement, title passes to the buyer at the time of sale/delivery. Consequently, if the buyer defaults, the seller cannot repossess the goods and can only enforce payment of the outstanding debt () through court action.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Transfer of ownership and legal remedies in Deferred Payment versus Hire Purchase schemes
Estimated Time:2m 0s