Question

Difficulty: HardConservation of Natural Resources and Environmental Management

Establishing game reserves and national parks represents a primary method of ex-situ conservation because wild populations are isolated from human interference within designated boundary zones.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is false because game reserves and national parks conserve organisms in their original habitats, making them examples of in-situ conservation rather than ex-situ conservation.
The statement is false because protecting biodiversity within natural ecosystems—such as in game reserves, biosphere reserves, and national parks—is defined as in-situ (on-site) conservation. Ex-situ (off-site) conservation involves removing organisms from their natural habitats to artificial environments like botanical gardens, zoological parks, or seed banks.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Define in-situ and ex-situ conservation strategies.
In-situ conservation preserves wild species within their natural ecosystems, whereas ex-situ conservation preserves species outside their natural surroundings.
Establishing clear definitions is necessary to categorize protected area management correctly.
2
Examine the operational environment of national parks and game reserves.
National parks maintain natural flora and fauna within their original geographic habitats without relocating them.
Determining where species reside within these reserves clarifies the mode of conservation.
3
Evaluate the statement's claim.
Classifying national parks as ex-situ conservation is false because the protection occurs on-site (in-situ).
Concluding the validity assessment of the given statement.

Key Concept

In-situ versus Ex-situ Conservation of Wildlife
Rate this question