Question

Difficulty: MediumThe Legislature: Unicameralism and Bicameralism

During a national constitutional conference, delegates proposed transitioning from a bicameral legislature to a unicameral system. Which of the following arguments best justifies this proposed transition?

  1. It significantly reduces the cost of governance and prevents undue delays in passing emergency legislation.Answer
  2. B
    It strengthens inter-organ checks and balances by allowing the legislature to exercise direct judicial review over executive actions.
  3. C
    It shifts legal sovereignty from parliament directly to the electorate during legislative debates.
  4. D
    It protects public officials from scrutiny by granting constitutional immunity to legislative leaders.

Answer

It significantly reduces the cost of governance and prevents undue delays in passing emergency legislation.
The choice emphasizing reduced governance costs and faster legislative processes correctly identifies the primary merits of a unicameral system. With only one chamber, state expenditure on legislative salaries and administration is lowered, and bills move to passage without inter-cameral disputes or duplication of readings.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core structural differences between bicameral and unicameral legislative systems.
Unicameralism features a single legislative chamber, whereas bicameralism consists of two distinct houses.
Understanding the structural difference highlights the operational advantages of having one house versus two.
2
Evaluate the financial and procedural consequences of operating a single legislative chamber.
Having one chamber requires maintaining fewer lawmakers and staff, avoiding duplicated committee proceedings and delays caused by inter-chamber disagreements.
This directly supports the rationale for switching to a unicameral system to save costs and accelerate law-making.

Key Concept

Arguments for Unicameralism vs. Bicameralism
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Rate this question