Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardAppeal Fallacies (Authority, Emotion, Majority)

The board of directors at a major technology firm is debating whether to transition the company's core product line to focus exclusively on artificial intelligence. During the meeting, several board members present arguments advocating for the transition.

Which of the following statements made by the board members commit a logical flaw by relying on an illegitimate appeal to authority, popular opinion, or emotion? Select all that apply.

  1. The transition to an AI-centric model is undeniably the most logically sound business strategy, a fact recently emphasized by Dr. Elena Rostova, a Nobel laureate in nutritional biochemistry.Answer
  2. We have a moral duty to our loyal employees to execute this pivot immediately; failing to do so will result in devastating layoffs that will ruin their families' livelihoods during this vulnerable economic season.Answer
  3. C
    We should adopt an AI strategy because every time a startup in our sector has done so, they have seen a subsequent spike in media coverage, proving that AI adoption directly generates positive press.
  4. It is undeniable that we should make this transition, considering that public opinion polls indicate an overwhelming majority of smartphone users strongly favor companies that market themselves as AI-first.Answer
  5. E
    We must proceed with this transition because the specific AI algorithms we plan to use are highly efficient at processing data, guaranteeing that the overall corporate transition will be a highly efficient business solution.

Answer

The statements that cite a biochemist's business opinion, invoke fear of employee layoffs, and rely on consumer public opinion polls.
The correct selections perfectly illustrate the three types of appeal fallacies requested. One statement argues for the pivot by invoking fear and pity regarding employee livelihoods, which is a classic Appeal to Emotion. Another relies on the expertise of a biochemist to validate a software business strategy, effectively using an expert well outside their relevant field, which is an Appeal to Unqualified Authority. The final correct selection attempts to prove the strategic soundness of the transition simply because a large percentage of consumers favor it, demonstrating an Appeal to Popular Opinion/Majority.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the question stem to determine the specific task.
The task requires identifying which of the provided statements commit one of three specific logical fallacies: illegitimate appeal to authority, appeal to popular opinion (majority), or appeal to emotion.
LSAT questions often present multiple flawed arguments, so it is critical to filter options based on the exact type of flaw requested.
2
Evaluate each statement to determine the nature of its supporting premises.
Three statements rely on irrelevant expertise (a biochemist), emotional manipulation (fear of layoffs), and mass belief (polls). Two statements rely on questionable causal links and part-to-whole assumptions.
Categorizing the reasoning structure of each option allows for accurate identification of the targeted fallacies.
3
Select the statements that match the targeted appeal fallacies and exclude those that contain other types of logical flaws.
The correct selections are the arguments relying on the biochemist, the fear of layoffs, and the public polls.
This directly fulfills the stem's criteria while successfully avoiding distractors that contain different logical errors (causal and composition fallacies).

Key Concept

Identifying and distinguishing specific appeal fallacies (Authority, Emotion, Majority) from other common logical flaws in argumentative reasoning.
Rate this question

Topics

Appeal Fallacies (Authority, Emotion, Majority)

More questions from this topic