Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardIdentifying Main Conclusions

Urban planners advocating for the expansion of municipal green spaces frequently cite the psychological benefits these areas provide to residents. However, municipalities must anchor their justifications for green space funding on the objectively measurable benefits of urban temperature reduction and stormwater management rather than on psychological metrics. Relying on psychological metrics to justify infrastructure ensures that funding will be highly volatile. Psychological well-being is heavily influenced by macroeconomic factors entirely divorced from city planning. When economic recessions occur, reported psychological benefits plummet, making green space budgets politically vulnerable precisely when infrastructure stimulus is most needed.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?

  1. A
    Using psychological well-being as the primary rationale for green space projects guarantees that the financial backing for these initiatives will be unstable.
  2. B
    Advocates for urban green spaces commonly attempt to secure expansion funding by emphasizing the mental health benefits these areas offer to residents.
  3. C
    Urban infrastructure projects that provide objectively measurable benefits are generally immune to the budget cuts that occur during economic recessions.
  4. City governments should base their appeals for green space funding on physical environmental improvements rather than on the psychological advantages for citizens.Answer
  5. E
    The psychological well-being of urban residents is heavily influenced by macroeconomic conditions that are entirely disconnected from municipal planning.

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that city governments should base their appeals for green space funding on physical environmental improvements rather than on the psychological advantages for citizens.
The correct answer accurately paraphrases the author's primary claim, located in the second sentence. The author asserts that municipalities should justify green space funding using measurable physical benefits rather than psychological metrics. The entire remainder of the stimulus serves to support this recommendation by explaining the political and economic vulnerabilities of relying on psychological metrics.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the argument structure to identify the primary claim the author is trying to prove.
The author is arguing against relying on psychological metrics and advocating for a different approach to justifying green space funding.
Identifying the main point requires distinguishing between context, supporting evidence, and the ultimate prescriptive claim.
2
Evaluate the role of the first sentence.
It provides background context regarding what urban planners currently do, setting up the view the author will critique.
Recognizing context helps eliminate answer choices that merely restate background information.
3
Examine the relationship between the second sentence and the rest of the stimulus.
The second sentence makes a prescriptive claim (municipalities 'must anchor' their justifications on measurable benefits). The subsequent sentences provide the rationale for this claim by explaining why psychological metrics are flawed.
A statement that is supported by the rest of the text, but does not itself support any other statement, is the main conclusion.
4
Distinguish between the main conclusion and intermediate conclusions.
The claim that funding will be 'highly volatile' is a conclusion drawn from the premises about macroeconomic factors, but it serves to support the ultimate conclusion that municipalities should change their funding justifications.
Failing to separate intermediate conclusions from the main conclusion is a common error on this question type.
5
Match the identified main conclusion to the answer choices.
The correct option paraphrases the second sentence, abstracting 'temperature reduction and stormwater management' to 'physical environmental improvements'.
The correct answer on main conclusion questions is often an accurate paraphrase of the structural conclusion.

Key Concept

Distinguishing the ultimate prescriptive conclusion from background context, intermediate conclusions, and supporting premises in a complex argument.
Rate this question

Topics

Identifying Main Conclusions

More questions from this topic