Scientist A: The recent decline in the local bee population is primarily caused by the use of neonicotinoid pesticides by nearby farms. When these pesticides were banned in a neighboring county, their bee populations recovered completely.
Scientist B: The neighboring county also experienced an unusually wet spring that year, which favored the growth of wildflowers. The decline in our local bee population is actually due to habitat loss from suburban development, not pesticide use.
The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Scientist A and Scientist B disagree over whether:
- the use of neonicotinoid pesticides is the primary cause of the decline in the local bee populationAnswer
- Bthere has been a recent decline in the local bee population
- Cthe bee population in the neighboring county recovered completely after the pesticide ban
- Dthe neighboring county experienced an unusually wet spring that favored wildflower growth
- Esuburban development should be restricted to protect local bee habitats
Answer
The correct answer is the option stating that the scientists disagree over whether the use of neonicotinoid pesticides is the primary cause of the decline in the local bee population.
The correct answer identifies the core dispute. Scientist A explicitly states that pesticide use is the primary cause of the local bee decline. Scientist B directly opposes this conclusion by attributing the decline to habitat loss and explicitly stating it is 'not pesticide use.' One says yes, the other says no, making this the exact point of contention.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Identifying the Point at Issue in a two-speaker dialogue requires finding a specific proposition that one speaker affirms and the other denies.
Estimated Time:1m 0s