Question

Difficulty: EasyTwo-Speaker Dialogues (Point at Issue)

Mayor: The proposed highway expansion is necessary to reduce traffic congestion, as it will divert commercial trucks away from city streets.
City Planner: While diverting commercial trucks is important, the highway expansion will actually increase overall traffic congestion by encouraging more commuters to drive instead of using public transit.

Statement: The Mayor and the City Planner disagree over whether the proposed highway expansion will reduce traffic congestion.

Answer: Answer

Answer

True
The text demonstrates a direct logical conflict: the Mayor asserts the expansion will reduce congestion, and the City Planner asserts it will increase congestion. This makes the statement an accurate description of their disagreement.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the first speaker's argument.
The Mayor concludes that the highway expansion will reduce traffic congestion.
Identifying the main conclusion of the first speaker establishes their primary stance.
2
Analyze the second speaker's response.
The City Planner states that the highway expansion will increase overall traffic congestion.
Identifying the second speaker's stance allows for comparison against the first speaker's conclusion.
3
Determine the point of overlap and conflict.
One asserts a reduction in congestion; the other asserts an increase. Therefore, they disagree on whether the expansion will reduce traffic congestion.
A valid point at issue requires one speaker to affirm a proposition while the other rejects it.

Key Concept

Identifying the precise point of disagreement in a two-speaker dialogue.
Rate this question