Question

Difficulty: Very hardFalse Dilemma (False Dichotomy)

Linguist: The indigenous language of the isolated valley community could not have evolved entirely from the language of the neighboring mountain tribes. There are fundamental syntactic structures in the valley language that are completely absent from the mountain language. Clearly, then, the valley language must have developed completely independently of any other known language in the region.

Which one of the following exhibits a flawed pattern of reasoning most similar to that exhibited by the linguist's argument?

  1. A
    The sharp drop in the tech company's stock price cannot be entirely due to the broader market downturn. The drop coincided exactly with the CEO's controversial television interview. Therefore, the interview must have been the sole catalyst for the stock's decline.
  2. B
    The candidate's economic proposal cannot be deemed a purely conservative strategy. The candidate has repeatedly insisted that the primary goal of the policy is the conservation of natural resources. Consequently, the proposal is actually an environmentalist strategy.
  3. The new software update could not have been created solely by the company's internal development team. The update includes a revolutionary encryption algorithm that the internal team lacks the expertise to design. Therefore, the update must have been purchased in its entirety from a third-party vendor.Answer
  4. D
    A comprehensive health policy must either reduce overall medical costs or substantially improve patient outcomes. The government's new regional health initiative successfully reduced medical costs. Thus, the initiative must be considered a comprehensive health policy.
  5. E
    An architectural design cannot win the international commission unless it incorporates sustainable energy systems. The firm's recent submission features a fully self-sustaining solar grid. Therefore, the submission is certain to win the commission.

Answer

The argument concluding that the software update must have been purchased in its entirety from a third-party vendor perfectly parallels the flawed reasoning found in the stimulus.
The correct response successfully mirrors the flawed logical structure of the stimulus. The linguist's argument commits a false dilemma by assuming that if a language did not evolve entirely from one specific source, it must have developed completely independently. It arbitrarily ignores the obvious middle ground of a mixed origin (e.g., partial influence from the mountain tribes combined with other external sources). Similarly, the correct argument assumes that if the software was not created solely by the internal team, it must have been purchased in its entirety from a third party, committing the identical fallacy of ignoring a collaborative middle ground.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the flawed reasoning in the linguist's argument.
The stimulus argues that because the valley language is not 100% derived from the mountain language, it must be 100% independent.
Identifying the specific structural flaw (False Dilemma / Rejection of Middle Ground) is necessary to find the appropriately parallel argument.
2
Abstract the logical pattern of the stimulus.
Pattern: Subject P lacks a feature required to be entirely caused by Source X. Therefore, Subject P must be entirely caused by Source Y (or have zero connection to X).
Abstracting the argument helps evaluate the answer choices strictly based on logical structure rather than subject matter.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the matching logical pattern.
The argument concerning the software update follows the exact same pattern: because the update was not created solely by the internal team, it illicitly concludes that it must have been purchased in its entirety from an outside vendor.
This choice commits the identical false dilemma fallacy, completely ignoring the possibility of a mixed origin or collaboration.
4
Verify that the other choices commit different logical flaws.
The remaining choices commit correlation-causation, equivocation, illegal reversal, and necessary/sufficient fallacies, respectively.
Confirming the specific flaws in the distractors ensures they do not structurally match the stimulus.

Key Concept

False Dilemma (Parallel Flaw)
Rate this question