Read the following passage.
For over a century, the prevailing consensus within paleoanthropology held that Neanderthals were cognitively impoverished relative to early *Homo sapiens*. This view, rooted primarily in early, flawed reconstructions of Neanderthal skeletal remains, posited that our hominin cousins lacked the neurological architecture necessary for symbolic thought, complex language, and sophisticated social organization. Consequently, the rapid replacement of Neanderthals by anatomically modern humans upon the latter’s arrival in Europe was historically explained as an inevitable triumph of superior cognitive flexibility over brute strength.
However, a cascade of recent archaeological discoveries has begun to systematically dismantle this deeply entrenched narrative. Excavations in the Iberian Peninsula have unearthed cave paintings that definitively predate the arrival of *Homo sapiens* in the region, indicating that Neanderthals were engaging in non-utilitarian, symbolic expression tens of thousands of years earlier than previously assumed. Furthermore, the discovery of eagle talons bearing deliberate cut marks, interpreted as jewelry, along with complex multi-component adhesive tools, suggests a level of planning and abstract representation that is highly advanced.
These findings strongly challenge the notion of human cognitive uniqueness during the Middle Paleolithic. Ultimately, the emerging archaeological record necessitates a fundamental revision of the traditional evolutionary paradigm: rather than being a cognitively deficient evolutionary dead-end, Neanderthals possessed symbolic and technological capacities that were largely comparable to those of early modern humans.
While some conservative scholars maintain that these artifacts represent isolated instances of acculturation—arguing that Neanderthals merely mimicked the behaviors of encroaching modern humans without grasping their underlying symbolic significance—this counterargument struggles to explain the chronological precedence of the Neanderthal artifacts. As dating techniques become more precise, it becomes increasingly untenable to dismiss Neanderthal cognitive parity as a mere artifact of cross-species imitation.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?
- AThe traditional model of hominin evolution is fundamentally flawed because it fails to recognize that all extinct hominin species possessed the neurological architecture necessary for symbolic thought.
- BWhile Neanderthals produced items such as cave paintings and complex tools, these artifacts most likely resulted from the mimicry of early modern humans rather than independent cognitive capacity.
- CExcavations in the Iberian Peninsula have provided conclusive evidence that Neanderthals created cave paintings and jewelry long before the arrival of anatomically modern humans in Europe.
- Recent archaeological discoveries require a revision of the traditional view of Neanderthal cognitive inferiority, showing that their symbolic and technological capabilities were largely comparable to those of early modern humans.Answer
- EThe newly discovered archaeological record definitively establishes that Neanderthals and early modern humans possessed completely identical neurological architecture and social organization.