Question

Difficulty: EasyShared Main Point and Purpose

Passage A
Prior to the French Revolution, France relied on a chaotic jumble of local weights and measures. A unit of measurement in one village might differ significantly from the same unit in a neighboring town. To resolve this confusion, revolutionary leaders commissioned scientists to create a single, rational, and universal standard based on the natural world: the metric system. This new system was intended to promote equality and scientific progress, preventing merchants from exploiting inconsistent measurements to cheat the public. Ultimately, the introduction of the metric system was a triumph of Enlightenment rationalism over traditional, fragmented practices.

Passage B
The almost universal adoption of the metric system today is largely due to its immense practical benefits for global commerce and scientific collaboration. In the nineteenth century, as international trade expanded rapidly, the need for a common language of measurement became undeniable. A standardized system allowed for industrial components to be manufactured in one country and perfectly assembled in another, drastically reducing costly errors. Furthermore, researchers worldwide adopted the metric system to easily share and independently verify experimental results. By providing a unified standard, the metric system solved the inefficiencies that had previously hindered international progress.

Based on the passages provided, match each statement to the passage or passages to which it correctly applies.

  • The metric system provided a unified standard that resolved the inefficiencies of earlier measurement methods.Both Passage A and Passage B
  • The creation of the metric system was driven by Enlightenment rationalism and revolutionary ideals.Passage A only
  • The widespread adoption of the metric system was primarily motivated by the needs of international commerce.Passage B only
  • The implementation of the metric system faced significant resistance from scientists who preferred traditional units.Neither Passage A nor Passage B

Answer

The statement about resolving inefficiencies matches Both passages. The statement about Enlightenment rationalism matches Passage A only. The statement about international commerce matches Passage B only. The statement about scientific resistance matches Neither passage.
By carefully reading the scope of each passage, we can see that both authors praise the metric system for providing a unified standard that eliminated previous inefficiencies. However, Passage A uniquely focuses on the philosophical and revolutionary origins of the system, while Passage B uniquely focuses on its practical benefits for international commerce. Finally, neither passage suggests that scientists resisted the system; both portray scientists as champions of it.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Passage A to determine its main point and specific claims.
Passage A focuses on the creation of the metric system during the French Revolution to replace confusing local measures with a rational, unified standard based on Enlightenment ideals.
Understanding the specific arguments of Passage A is necessary to classify the statements.
2
Analyze Passage B to determine its main point and specific claims.
Passage B focuses on the practical reasons for the metric system's global adoption, specifically how a unified standard benefited international trade and scientific collaboration.
Understanding the specific arguments of Passage B is necessary to classify the statements.
3
Evaluate each statement against the main points and details of both passages.
The first statement represents the shared core concept. The second statement is unique to Passage A's historical context. The third statement is unique to Passage B's economic context. The fourth statement contradicts the facts presented in both texts.
Matching each statement requires synthesizing the authors' shared viewpoints while respecting their distinct focuses.

Key Concept

Identifying shared and distinct points in comparative reading passages by analyzing the specific scope, details, and purpose of each author's argument.
Rate this question