Analyze the structural composition of the following argument concerning art restoration. Connect each extracted quotation to the specific logical function it performs within the author's reasoning.
Argument: Detractors of the recent restoration of the cathedral's frescoes maintain that the newly brightened colors obliterate the artwork's historical authenticity. This grievance, however, is fundamentally misguided. It is true that the original artist applied pigments widely known to degrade into dull earth tones over centuries; yet, archival records confirm these pigments were intensely vibrant upon application. Thus, restoring these vivid hues genuinely honors the creator's initial vision. It follows that the current restoration initiative is ethically justified, despite unsettling modern observers who have grown accustomed to the decayed aesthetic.
- Detractors of the recent restoration of the cathedral's frescoes maintain that the newly brightened colors obliterate the artwork's historical authenticity.It is a claim that the author's overall argument is formulated to reject.
- Archival records confirm these pigments were intensely vibrant upon application.It serves as a primary premise used to justify an intermediate conclusion.
- Restoring these vivid hues genuinely honors the creator's initial vision.It functions as an intermediate conclusion that directly supports the author's final claim.
- The current restoration initiative is ethically justified.It expresses the main conclusion of the argument as a whole.