Question

Difficulty: HardDetermining Statement Roles

Review the following argument presented by a management theorist. Match each excerpted statement from the stimulus to its exact logical role in the argument's structure.

Management theorist: Many contemporary consultants assert that adopting open-plan office layouts inevitably fosters spontaneous interdepartmental collaboration. However, this widespread prescriptive advice is fundamentally counterproductive. Recent observational studies demonstrate that employees situated in open-plan environments consistently wear active noise-canceling headphones to mitigate ambient acoustic distractions. Because utilizing such devices creates a visible barrier that explicitly discourages informal conversation, open-plan layouts actively suppress the precise interactions they are ostensibly designed to promote.

  • adopting open-plan office layouts inevitably fosters spontaneous interdepartmental collaborationA claim attributed to others that the argument as a whole is designed to reject
  • this widespread prescriptive advice is fundamentally counterproductiveThe overall conclusion of the theorist's argument
  • employees situated in open-plan environments consistently wear active noise-canceling headphonesA piece of evidence advanced to justify an intermediate conclusion
  • open-plan layouts actively suppress the precise interactions they are ostensibly designed to promoteA subsidiary conclusion that serves as a premise for the primary claim

Answer

The statements map logically as follows: the assertion about fostering collaboration is the opposing view to be rejected; the claim that the advice is counterproductive is the main conclusion; the observation about headphones is a premise; and the claim about suppressing interactions is an intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion.
In this argument, the author introduces an opposing view (consultants assert open-plan layouts foster collaboration) and immediately rejects it by stating that this advice is counterproductive (the main conclusion). To support this main conclusion, the author provides a chain of reasoning: observational studies show employees wear headphones (premise), which creates a barrier that discourages conversation (premise). These premises logically lead to the deduction that open-plan layouts actively suppress interactions (an intermediate conclusion). This intermediate conclusion then serves as the direct support for the main conclusion that the initial advice was counterproductive.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The main conclusion is 'this widespread prescriptive advice is fundamentally counterproductive.'
This is the primary claim the author is trying to prove, encompassing all other evidence and structural points in the passage.
2
Analyze the role of the final sentence.
The statement that 'open-plan layouts actively suppress the precise interactions...' acts as an intermediate conclusion.
It follows logically from the premise about headphones creating barriers (indicated by 'Because...'), and it provides the direct reason why the advice is fundamentally counterproductive.
3
Determine the function of the opening sentence.
It introduces a claim that 'inevitably fosters spontaneous interdepartmental collaboration.'
The author attributes this to 'many contemporary consultants' and immediately pivots with 'However', marking this as the viewpoint the argument is designed to reject.
4
Categorize the empirical data provided.
The statement about employees wearing 'noise-canceling headphones' is a premise.
It introduces uncontested factual evidence from observational studies used to support the intermediate conclusion about barriers and suppressed interactions.

Key Concept

Determining Statement Roles
Rate this question