Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardCannot Be True Questions

Under the revised zoning laws of Oakhaven, any developer who constructs a high-density residential complex must secure a municipal waiver. Securing a municipal waiver requires the developer to allocate at least 20 percent of the units for low-income housing, unless the developer has received a historical preservation tax credit. However, no developer who receives a historical preservation tax credit is eligible to apply for the state urban revitalization grant. According to city records, every developer currently constructing a high-density residential complex in Oakhaven has been awarded the state urban revitalization grant.

Based on the information provided, it could be true that there is a developer currently constructing a high-density residential complex in Oakhaven who has not allocated at least 20 percent of the units for low-income housing.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is false. It is logically impossible for a developer in this scenario to avoid allocating at least 20 percent of the units for low-income housing.
The correct evaluation is false. The stimulus establishes that every developer constructing a high-density residential complex has the state urban revitalization grant. Because having a historical preservation tax credit precludes a developer from receiving this grant, none of these current high-density developers have the historical tax credit. To secure the required municipal waiver without possessing the historical tax credit, a developer is strictly required by the 'unless' clause to allocate at least 20 percent of the units for low-income housing. Therefore, the scenario described in the statement is a logical impossibility.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Translate the first and final premises regarding high-density developers.
High-Density -> Municipal Waiver, and High-Density -> Revitalization Grant.
To establish the baseline mandatory conditions for all developers currently building high-density complexes.
2
Translate the exclusionary premise and apply its contrapositive.
Historical Credit -> NOT Revitalization Grant. Contrapositive: Revitalization Grant -> NOT Historical Credit.
To connect the developers' known grant status to their eligibility for the tax credit.
3
Translate the 'unless' conditional regarding the municipal waiver.
Municipal Waiver -> Low-Income Allocation OR Historical Credit. This is logically equivalent to: If NOT Historical Credit, then Low-Income Allocation must be met.
'Unless' introduces a necessary condition that must be fulfilled if the alternative condition is absent.
4
Chain the deductions together to determine what must be true.
High-Density developers have the Revitalization Grant. Therefore, they do NOT have the Historical Credit. Because they must have a Municipal Waiver and lack the Historical Credit, they MUST provide the Low-Income Allocation.
To form a complete deductive chain proving that High-Density -> Low-Income Allocation.
5
Evaluate the given statement against the deduced rule.
The statement claims a high-density developer could fail to provide the low-income allocation. Since we proved they absolutely must provide it, the statement describes a scenario that cannot be true, making the statement false.
To answer the prompt based on strict logical necessity.

Key Concept

Formal logic chaining, contrapositives, and the precise interpretation of 'unless' in conditional statements.
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Cannot Be True Questions

More questions from this topic