Under the new environmental directives, any regional municipality that enacts a comprehensive water conservation protocol must either increase its baseline utility rates or secure a federal sustainability grant. A municipality is eligible to secure a federal sustainability grant only if it demonstrates a verifiable reduction in agricultural runoff. However, municipalities situated in the historically drought-prone Arid Basin region are strictly prohibited by state mandate from increasing their baseline utility rates. The municipality of Oakhaven, which is situated in the Arid Basin region, has recently enacted a comprehensive water conservation protocol.
Which of the following must be true on the basis of the statements above?
- Oakhaven has demonstrated a verifiable reduction in agricultural runoff.Answer
- BAny municipality that demonstrates a verifiable reduction in agricultural runoff will secure a federal sustainability grant.
- CIf a municipality does not enact a comprehensive water conservation protocol, it will not secure a federal sustainability grant.
- DMost municipalities situated in the Arid Basin region will not demonstrate a verifiable reduction in agricultural runoff.
- EOakhaven enacted its comprehensive water conservation protocol in order to secure a federal sustainability grant.
Answer
The correct inference is that Oakhaven has demonstrated a verifiable reduction in agricultural runoff.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the conditional statements provided in the stimulus. Because Oakhaven enacted the protocol, it is required to either increase its utility rates or secure a grant. Since state law prohibits Arid Basin municipalities from increasing rates, Oakhaven is left with only one option: securing the grant. Securing the grant inherently requires a verifiable reduction in agricultural runoff, meaning Oakhaven must have met this requirement.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Chaining Conditional Statements and Eliminating Alternatives