Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardComparative Analogies

Passage A
In linguistics, prescriptivism is the practice of elevating one specific variety of a language as the absolute standard, penalizing any grammatical deviations. Prescriptivists justify their strict rules by appealing to historical precedent or classical logic. However, sociolinguists argue that this approach fundamentally misunderstands the nature of language, which is an inherently organic, evolving system shaped dynamically by its users. By attempting to freeze a language in a purportedly "correct" static state, prescriptivists ignore the natural mechanisms of linguistic innovation and inadvertently marginalize the communities whose dialects are deemed "incorrect."

Passage B
The traditional model of forest management, which aims to aggressively eliminate all natural wildfires to protect commercial timber yields, is increasingly viewed by ecologists as dangerously misguided. Historically, many forest ecosystems evolved with periodic, low-intensity fires that cleared accumulated underbrush and allowed specific fire-dependent seed types to germinate. By forcefully suppressing these fires in a misguided attempt to maintain an idealized, static forest state, managers have not only disrupted natural life cycles but also inadvertently created the conditions for unnatural, catastrophic infernos due to the massive accumulation of unchecked underbrush.

Which of the following scenarios is most structurally analogous to the flawed practices criticized by the authors of both Passage A and Passage B?

  1. An urban planning board attempts to preserve the historical character of a vibrant neighborhood by strictly prohibiting any new architectural modifications, which unintentionally stifles the organic cultural growth that made the area desirable and drives away local businesses.Answer
  2. B
    A national park service initiates a program to eliminate invasive insect species to protect native trees, thereby successfully restoring the forest ecosystem to its original, historically documented state.
  3. C
    A strict educational policy penalizes students for deviations from a standardized curriculum, aiming to eliminate incorrect answers and increase overall academic yields across all communities.
  4. D
    A city council permanently closes a public beach to all human visitors in order to prevent environmental degradation, resulting in a perfectly preserved but entirely unutilized natural space.
  5. E
    A community of sociolinguists documents the evolving slang of a marginalized group in order to establish a new, rigid dictionary that can be used to standardize their dialect.

Answer

The correct answer is the scenario describing an urban planning board that prohibits modifications to a vibrant neighborhood, stifling its growth.
The correct answer accurately maps the abstract structural relationship found in both passages. In both Passage A (linguistics) and Passage B (forestry), an authority figure attempts to impose a static, artificial ideal onto an inherently dynamic, organic system (language and forest ecosystems, respectively). This misguided suppression of natural evolution inevitably backfires, causing severe, unintended harm to the very system they sought to control or protect. The urban planning scenario perfectly mirrors this dynamic: the board (authority) imposes static preservation (artificial ideal) on a vibrant neighborhood (organic system), which unintentionally stifles growth and drives away businesses (unintended backfire).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core argument of Passage A.
Passage A criticizes prescriptivists for treating language—a naturally evolving system—as something that must be frozen in a static 'correct' state, which inadvertently harms the language community.
Identifying the logical structure of the first passage is required to find a commonality.
2
Analyze the core argument of Passage B.
Passage B criticizes forest managers for treating forests—ecosystems dependent on dynamic cycles like fire—as entities to be kept in a static, ideal state, which unintentionally causes catastrophic damage.
Identifying the logical structure of the second passage reveals the shared structural flaw.
3
Synthesize the shared structural flaw criticized in both passages.
Both passages criticize the imposition of an artificial, static ideal onto an inherently dynamic, organically evolving system, an action that ultimately backfires and causes severe unintended harm to the system.
A comparative analogy requires abstracting the specific content into a generalized, content-agnostic logical relationship.
4
Evaluate the options against this synthesized structural flaw.
The urban planning scenario matches perfectly: it imposes static preservation (artificial ideal) on an organic neighborhood (dynamic system), leading to the unintended harm of stifling its cultural growth (catastrophic backfire).
The correct option must contain all elements of the generalized relationship without relying on surface-level content similarities.

Key Concept

Abstracting and mapping the structural logic of an argument across disparate subject matters.
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Comparative Analogies

More questions from this topic