Comparative Analogies

10 questions

Question 1Question →

Passage A
In linguistics, prescriptivism is the practice of elevating one specific variety of a language as the absolute standard, penalizing any grammatical deviations. Prescriptivists justify their strict rules by appealing to historical precedent or classical logic. However, sociolinguists argue that this approach fundamentally misunderstands the nature of language, which is an inherently organic, evolving system shaped dynamically by its users. By attempting to freeze a language in a purportedly "correct" static state, prescriptivists ignore the natural mechanisms of linguistic innovation and inadvertently marginalize the communities whose dialects are deemed "incorrect."

Passage B
The traditional model of forest management, which aims to aggressively eliminate all natural wildfires to protect commercial timber yields, is increasingly viewed by ecologists as dangerously misguided. Historically, many forest ecosystems evolved with periodic, low-intensity fires that cleared accumulated underbrush and allowed specific fire-dependent seed types to germinate. By forcefully suppressing these fires in a misguided attempt to maintain an idealized, static forest state, managers have not only disrupted natural life cycles but also inadvertently created the conditions for unnatural, catastrophic infernos due to the massive accumulation of unchecked underbrush.

Which of the following scenarios is most structurally analogous to the flawed practices criticized by the authors of both Passage A and Passage B?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: An urban planning board attempts to preserve the historical character of a vibrant neighborhood by strictly prohibiting any new architectural modifications, which unintentionally stifles the organic cultural growth that made the area desirable and drives away local businesses.

Answer

The correct answer is the scenario describing an urban planning board that prohibits modifications to a vibrant neighborhood, stifling its growth.
The correct answer accurately maps the abstract structural relationship found in both passages. In both Passage A (linguistics) and Passage B (forestry), an authority figure attempts to impose a static, artificial ideal onto an inherently dynamic, organic system (language and forest ecosystems, respectively). This misguided suppression of natural evolution inevitably backfires, causing severe, unintended harm to the very system they sought to control or protect. The urban planning scenario perfectly mirrors this dynamic: the board (authority) imposes static preservation (artificial ideal) on a vibrant neighborhood (organic system), which unintentionally stifles growth and drives away businesses (unintended backfire).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core argument of Passage A.
Passage A criticizes prescriptivists for treating language—a naturally evolving system—as something that must be frozen in a static 'correct' state, which inadvertently harms the language community.
Identifying the logical structure of the first passage is required to find a commonality.
2
Analyze the core argument of Passage B.
Passage B criticizes forest managers for treating forests—ecosystems dependent on dynamic cycles like fire—as entities to be kept in a static, ideal state, which unintentionally causes catastrophic damage.
Identifying the logical structure of the second passage reveals the shared structural flaw.
3
Synthesize the shared structural flaw criticized in both passages.
Both passages criticize the imposition of an artificial, static ideal onto an inherently dynamic, organically evolving system, an action that ultimately backfires and causes severe unintended harm to the system.
A comparative analogy requires abstracting the specific content into a generalized, content-agnostic logical relationship.
4
Evaluate the options against this synthesized structural flaw.
The urban planning scenario matches perfectly: it imposes static preservation (artificial ideal) on an organic neighborhood (dynamic system), leading to the unintended harm of stifling its cultural growth (catastrophic backfire).
The correct option must contain all elements of the generalized relationship without relying on surface-level content similarities.

Key Concept

Abstracting and mapping the structural logic of an argument across disparate subject matters.
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Question 2Question →

Passage A
In the mid-nineteenth century, Ignaz Semmelweis demonstrated that implementing hand-washing protocols drastically reduced mortality rates in maternity wards. Yet, the medical establishment vehemently rejected his findings. This dismissal was not driven by a refutation of his statistical data, which was rigorous and clear. Rather, Semmelweis's contemporaries operated under the miasma theory—which attributed diseases to "bad air"—and could not conceive of invisible particles transmitting illness. Without a biologically plausible mechanism that fit the prevailing medical paradigm, the establishment found it easier to ignore the empirical success of Semmelweis's methods than to dismantle their foundational understanding of disease.

Passage B
When Alfred Wegener first proposed the theory of continental drift in 1912, he presented compelling evidence, including the jigsaw-puzzle fit of the continents and identical fossil records found on widely separated landmasses. Nevertheless, the geological community broadly ridiculed his hypothesis for decades. Geologists largely did not contest the fossil data itself. Instead, their opposition stemmed from Wegener's inability to provide a credible physical mechanism; he could not explain what monumental forces could possibly propel solid continents through the ocean floor. Until the later discovery of plate tectonics provided that missing mechanism, Wegener's empirical observations were treated as mere anomalies that lacked theoretical justification.

Based on the relationship between empirical evidence and theoretical acceptance described in both passages, which one of the following scenarios presents the most analogous situation?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A meteorologist's highly accurate long-term forecasting model is dismissed by climatologists because, while statistically predictive, it offers no physical explanation for the atmospheric changes it anticipates.

Answer

The scenario where a meteorologist's highly accurate forecasting model is dismissed because it offers no physical explanation for the changes it anticipates.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the shared structural logic of both passages. In Passage A, Semmelweis's empirical data was rigorous, yet rejected because he lacked a biological mechanism. In Passage B, Wegener's empirical evidence was compelling, yet rejected because he lacked a physical mechanism. The correct scenario perfectly mirrors this dynamic: a forecasting model's empirical success (it is statistically predictive) is dismissed by the establishment solely because it lacks a causal mechanism (no physical explanation).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Passage A to identify the core structural relationship.
Passage A describes a situation where an empirically proven method (hand-washing) is rejected because it lacks a known biological mechanism that fits the current scientific paradigm.
Understanding the fundamental logic of the first passage is required before comparing it to the second.
2
Analyze Passage B to confirm the shared structural relationship.
Passage B describes a situation where strong empirical evidence (continental fit and fossils) is rejected because the author could not provide a credible physical mechanism for continental movement.
Identifying the overlap between both passages reveals the exact relational principle that must be matched in the answer choices.
3
Synthesize the shared core principle (the 'analogy target').
Target principle: An accurate, empirically supported theory or model is rejected by the scientific establishment solely because it lacks a causal mechanism consistent with prevailing theories.
Creating a generalized abstract principle makes it easier to evaluate the options without getting distracted by subject matter.
4
Evaluate the options against the synthesized principle.
Only the meteorology scenario matches all elements: it features accurate empirical data (statistically predictive) that is dismissed due to a missing causal mechanism (no physical explanation).
This guarantees that the chosen scenario relies on the same deep functional logic rather than superficial keyword similarities or partial logical matches.

Key Concept

Comparative Analogies
Question 3Question →

Read the following summaries of two arguments:

Passage A argues that the transition to standardized coinage was driven primarily by the state's need to efficiently collect taxes across a vast empire, rather than to facilitate local trade.

Passage B posits that the development of bright plumage in certain bird species evolved primarily as a mechanism for long-distance species recognition in dense forests, rather than for attracting mates in close proximity.

Match each element from Passage A's argument with its direct structural counterpart in Passage B's argument.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Standardized coinage
The state's need to collect taxes
Facilitating local trade

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Standardized coinage maps to Bright plumage; The state's need to collect taxes maps to Long-distance species recognition; Facilitating local trade maps to Attracting mates in close proximity.
The correct matches perfectly align the logical components of both arguments. In both passages, an author presents a phenomenon (coinage and plumage), attributes it to a primary functional cause (tax collection and species recognition), and expressly dismisses an alternative or commonly assumed explanation (local trade and attracting mates).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the argumentative structure of Passage A.
The structure is: [Phenomenon] was driven by [Proposed Primary Reason], rather than [Secondary/Rejected Reason].
Identifying the distinct structural roles of the elements in the first passage is necessary to find their logical counterparts.
2
Analyze the argumentative structure of Passage B.
The structure is: [Phenomenon] evolved as a mechanism for [Proposed Primary Reason], rather than for [Secondary/Rejected Reason].
This establishes the framework to allow for a direct one-to-one mapping between the two passages.
3
Map the corresponding structural roles between the two passages.
Phenomenon: Coinage = Plumage. Proposed Primary Reason: Tax collection = Species recognition. Rejected Reason: Local trade = Attracting mates.
This completes the comparative analogy based entirely on argumentative function.

Key Concept

Comparative Analogies
Question 4Question →

Read the following two excerpts outlining distinct theories from different academic disciplines:

Excerpt A
According to Thomas Kuhn, scientific progress is not purely cumulative. Instead, disciplines spend long periods in 'normal science,' operating under a universally accepted paradigm that dictates which problems are legitimate. Over time, anomalies—observations that the current paradigm cannot explain—accumulate. Initially ignored or dismissed, these anomalies eventually induce a profound crisis of confidence within the scientific community. This crisis is resolved only through a sudden, discontinuous 'paradigm shift,' wherein an entirely new theoretical framework abruptly overthrows and replaces the old, redefining the discipline's fundamental boundaries.

Excerpt B
The theory of punctuated equilibrium challenges the view of steady, gradual evolution. It posits that species spend the vast majority of their geological history in morphological stasis, exhibiting essentially no physical change. However, as localized ecological stresses silently build over time, a population's existing physiological traits become increasingly mismatched with its environment. This growing evolutionary friction reaches a critical threshold, often manifesting as a sudden environmental cataclysm. This triggers a rapid, explosive burst of speciation in isolated populations. Consequently, novel descendant species emerge abruptly in the fossil record, completely superseding their ancestors.

Based on the structural analogies between the two chronological models presented, match each conceptual element from Excerpt A with its precise logical counterpart in Excerpt B.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Periods of 'normal science'
Accumulation of anomalies
Profound crisis of confidence
Discontinuous 'paradigm shift'
New theoretical framework

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The structural analogies map as follows: 'Normal science' equates to 'Morphological stasis' (the baseline stability); 'Accumulation of anomalies' equates to 'Growing mismatch' (the building tension); 'Crisis of confidence' equates to 'Critical threshold' (the breaking point); 'Paradigm shift' equates to 'Burst of speciation' (the mechanism of change); and 'New theoretical framework' equates to 'Novel descendant species' (the resulting outcome).
Each matched pair plays the exact same functional and chronological role in their respective models. Both models describe a system defined by long periods of inertia (normal science / stasis), which are undermined by building internal friction (anomalies / stress mismatch). This tension inevitably peaks at an acute breaking point (crisis / cataclysm), forcing a sudden, transformative event (paradigm shift / speciation) that results in a completely new dominant state (new framework / descendant species).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the overarching chronological structure shared by both excerpts.
Both excerpts describe a five-stage model: 1) Baseline stability, 2) Gradual accumulation of tension, 3) An acute breaking point, 4) A sudden mechanism of transition, and 5) A new stable outcome.
Identifying the shared macro-structure is required before mapping specific, micro-level concepts.
2
Isolate the baseline state in both passages.
In Excerpt A, the long period of stability is 'normal science'. In Excerpt B, it is 'morphological stasis'.
Establishing the starting point anchors the rest of the chronological analogy.
3
Distinguish the building tension from the acute trigger.
The 'accumulation of anomalies' (A) is the slow buildup matching 'growing mismatch from ecological stresses' (B). The resulting 'profound crisis of confidence' (A) is the acute trigger matching the 'critical threshold of environmental cataclysm' (B).
Conflating the underlying cause with the immediate trigger is a common error in structural reading comprehension.
4
Distinguish the action of transition from the final result.
The 'discontinuous paradigm shift' (A) is the active transition matching the 'explosive burst of speciation' (B). The 'new theoretical framework' (A) is the final static outcome matching the 'novel descendant species' (B).
Precise relational mapping requires separating verbs/processes from nouns/outcomes.

Key Concept

Relational Mapping and Structural Analogies
Estimated Time:3m 0s
Question 5Question →

Passage A
To save endangered indigenous languages, preservationists must enforce strict lexical purism. This involves creating definitive dictionaries, purging foreign loanwords, and establishing language academies to codify correct grammar. Language is a fragile cultural artifact; only by shielding it from the contaminating influence of dominant global languages and artificial modern jargon can its authentic character be maintained for future generations.

Passage B
Languages are not static museum pieces; they are living ecosystems. Attempting to artificially freeze an endangered language only accelerates its demise by rendering it incapable of expressing contemporary realities. True revitalization requires fostering organic community vitality. This means encouraging speakers to use the language in new domains, such as technology and pop culture, and embracing organic structural changes and loanwords as natural adaptations necessary for survival in a dynamic world.

The relationship between the preservation strategy advocated in Passage A and the revitalization strategy advocated in Passage B is most analogous to the relationship between which of the following pairs of strategies?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Attempting to save an endangered plant species by cultivating it exclusively in a sealed, climate-controlled greenhouse, versus attempting to save the species by restoring its natural ecosystem and allowing it to develop genetic variations in response to environmental stressors.

Answer

Attempting to save an endangered plant species by cultivating it exclusively in a sealed, climate-controlled greenhouse, versus attempting to save the species by restoring its natural ecosystem and allowing it to develop genetic variations in response to environmental stressors.
The correct answer accurately distills the fundamental conflict between the two passages into a structurally parallel scenario from biology. Passage A's approach of 'shielding' language in an artificial state of 'purism' maps perfectly to cultivating a plant in a 'sealed, climate-controlled greenhouse.' Passage B's approach of treating language as a 'living ecosystem' that must embrace 'natural adaptations' maps perfectly to restoring a plant's ecosystem and allowing it to develop 'genetic variations in response to environmental stressors.'

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core argument and underlying mechanism of Passage A.
Passage A views language as a fragile artifact that must be isolated, shielded from outside influence, and kept in a state of artificial stasis (lexical purism, academies) to be preserved.
Understanding the abstract structure of the first half of the analogy is required.
2
Analyze the core argument and underlying mechanism of Passage B.
Passage B views language as a living ecosystem that must interact with its environment, integrate new elements (loanwords), and organically adapt to survive.
Understanding the abstract structure of the second half of the analogy is required.
3
Synthesize the abstract relational dynamic between the two passages.
The relationship is: Preservation via extreme isolation and stasis VERSUS Preservation via environmental integration and organic adaptation.
This establishes the blueprint needed to evaluate the answer choices.
4
Evaluate the options against the relational blueprint.
The option comparing a sealed greenhouse (isolation/stasis) to a restored ecosystem with genetic variation (integration/adaptation) perfectly matches the logical blueprint.
Analogies must match on a structural level, independent of the subject matter.

Key Concept

Identifying abstract structural parallels between differing argumentative viewpoints.
Question 6Question →

Read the following summaries of two distinct phenomena:

Passage A (Ecology)
In old-growth forests, the 'nurse log' phenomenon occurs when a fallen, decaying tree provides a nutrient-rich, moisture-retaining microenvironment that fosters the growth of new seedlings. The decaying log acts as a localized reserve, subsidizing the vulnerable early stages of the seedlings' development. This support allows them to survive the intense competitive pressure of the surrounding mature canopy trees, which hoard sunlight and resources. Eventually, the seedlings' root systems become robust enough to anchor directly into the forest floor's wider soil network, sustaining themselves independently.

Passage B (Economics)
In the technology sector, 'angel investors' provide crucial early-stage seed funding to new startup companies. These startups operate in a highly saturated market where established tech conglomerates command most of the consumer attention and revenue. The angel investor's capital acts as a financial buffer, allowing the startup to develop its product and survive initial market pressures. Once the startup has established a viable business model and proven its resilience, it can independently secure standard venture capital or public market funding for long-term growth.

Match each ecological element from Passage A with its precise structural and functional analog in Passage B.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

The decaying nurse log's localized reserve
The vulnerable early development of seedlings
Resource hoarding by mature canopy trees
Anchoring into the wider soil network

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct mapping aligns the ecological roles in Passage A with their functional economic equivalents in Passage B: the nurse log maps to the angel investor, the seedlings to the startups, the canopy trees to the tech conglomerates, and the soil network to public market funding.
The analogy hinges on the functional relationships within two systems of growth and resource allocation. The nurse log and the angel investor both provide necessary early-stage, localized subsidies. The seedlings and startups are the vulnerable new entities relying on these subsidies. The canopy trees and tech conglomerates act as the environmental competitive pressure. Finally, the soil network and public market funding represent the broader, long-term resource pools that the entities graduate to once they achieve maturity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the functional role of the 'nurse log' in Passage A.
It provides initial, localized support. In Passage B, this matches the 'angel investors' who provide early financial buffers.
Both act as temporary subsidies for a vulnerable new entity, making them functional analogs.
2
Analyze the role of the 'seedlings' in Passage A.
They are the new entities in early development. In Passage B, this matches the 'startups' in their initial product development phase.
Both are the primary subjects receiving early-stage support in order to survive.
3
Analyze the role of the 'mature canopy trees' in Passage A.
They hoard resources and create competitive pressure. In Passage B, this matches 'established tech conglomerates'.
Both represent the dominant environmental pressure that the new entities must overcome.
4
Analyze the role of the 'wider soil network' in Passage A.
It is the broader, independent sustenance system reached upon maturity. In Passage B, this matches 'standard venture capital or public market funding'.
Both represent the long-term, mainstream resource pool accessed after initial survival and establishment.

Key Concept

Comparative Analogies: Structural and Functional Mapping
Question 7Question →

Consider the following two excerpts outlining distinct analytical models:

Excerpt A (Economics)
A nation's baseline monetary policy establishes the general environment for economic expansion, yet the unpredictable swings in collective consumer sentiment ultimately drive short-term market volatility.

Excerpt B (Epidemiology)
The inherent transmissibility of a pathogen sets the foundational risk level for widespread infection, whereas stochastic, high-contact superspreader events directly precipitate localized outbreak spikes.

Based on the analogical relationship between the two models, match each economic component from Excerpt A with its precise functional analog in Excerpt B.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Baseline monetary policy
General environment for economic expansion
Unpredictable swings in collective consumer sentiment
Short-term market volatility

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Baseline monetary policy matches inherent transmissibility; general environment matches foundational risk level; unpredictable consumer sentiment swings matches stochastic superspreader events; short-term market volatility matches localized outbreak spikes.
The correct pairings align the foundational causes (monetary policy and pathogen transmissibility), their corresponding systemic conditions (economic expansion environment and infection risk level), the unpredictable catalysts (consumer sentiment swings and superspreader events), and the resulting acute effects (market volatility and outbreak spikes). This mapping perfectly preserves the causal architecture of both excerpts.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the causal and logical structure of Excerpt A.
Identified a foundational factor (monetary policy) leading to a broad condition (economic environment), contrasted with a volatile catalyst (consumer sentiment) leading to an acute effect (market volatility).
Understanding the precise role of each element is necessary to map them across disciplines.
2
Analyze the causal and logical structure of Excerpt B.
Identified a foundational factor (transmissibility) leading to a broad condition (foundational risk), contrasted with a volatile catalyst (superspreader events) leading to an acute effect (localized spikes).
This establishes the parallel relational framework needed for the comparative analogy.
3
Map the corresponding elements based solely on their structural functions.
The fundamental causes match, their broad effects match, the volatile triggers match, and their acute effects match.
Comparative analogies require mapping based on functional roles within an argument rather than topical similarity or abstractness.

Key Concept

Structural Parallelism in Comparative Analogies
Question 8Question →

Passage A
The primary goal of the art conservator should be to return a work to its original state—the exact condition intended by its creator. Over centuries, paintings naturally accumulate dirt and discolored varnish, and they are sometimes even subjected to overpainting by later artists attempting to 'modernize' the work. These accretions obscure the artist's original vision. True conservation requires a forensic approach: meticulously stripping away these subsequent layers to reveal the pristine, authentic work beneath. To leave later additions intact out of a misplaced reverence for 'history' is to allow the corruption of a masterpiece to stand.

Passage B
In architectural preservation, the 'palimpsest' philosophy argues that a historic building is a living document, its value inextricably tied to the modifications it has undergone over generations. A medieval cathedral with a Renaissance facade and Victorian stained glass embodies the continuous interaction between the structure and society over centuries. Stripping away these later additions to 'restore' the building to a hypothetical original state destroys its historical narrative. These structural evolutions are not corruptions; they are the very chapters of the building's history. To erase them is to manufacture an artificial purity that prioritizes an idealized past over the actual, messy reality of historical survival.

Which of the following pairs of approaches to editing a historic literary text is most closely analogous to the approaches to conservation and preservation advocated in Passage A and Passage B, respectively?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: An approach that removes all subsequent editorial changes to publish only the author's original draft; an approach that retains all historical revisions and marginalia to document the text's evolution.

Answer

The pair of approaches that matches Passage A (removing later changes to isolate the original draft) and Passage B (retaining historical revisions to document the text's evolution).
The correct answer accurately maps the core philosophy of each passage to a parallel scenario in literary editing. Passage A advocates for removing all later additions to reveal the creator's original intent, which perfectly parallels removing subsequent editorial changes to isolate the original draft. Passage B argues that later modifications are valuable parts of the object's history, which perfectly parallels retaining historical revisions to document the text's evolution.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core philosophy of Passage A.
Passage A advocates for removing all later additions to restore a work strictly to its original creator's intent.
To establish the first half of the required analogy.
2
Analyze the core philosophy of Passage B.
Passage B advocates for preserving later additions, viewing them as valuable parts of the object's ongoing historical narrative.
To establish the second half of the required analogy.
3
Evaluate the answer choices for a parallel relationship applied to literary editing.
The correct option must feature a first approach that isolates the author's original draft by removing later edits, and a second approach that embraces subsequent revisions as historical documentation.
The question asks for a pair of approaches analogous to Passage A and Passage B, in that exact order.

Key Concept

Identifying analogous relationships based on the core logical principles of comparative passages.
Question 9Question →

Passage A
In the mid-twentieth century, the architectural movement known as Brutalism emerged, driven by a profoundly utopian ethos. Proponents championed the use of unfinished concrete—*béton brut*—as a great equalizer. By rejecting the elaborate, costly ornamentation of earlier styles, Brutalist architects sought to construct civic spaces that were uncompromisingly honest, functional, and accessible. The stark, imposing geometries of these buildings were intended to reflect a democratic transparency, stripping away bourgeois pretensions to offer raw, unmediated environments where all citizens could interact on equal footing.

Passage B
Despite its egalitarian origins, Brutalist architecture has largely failed to endear itself to the communities it was meant to serve. To the contemporary urban dweller, the massive, windowless concrete facades do not communicate democratic transparency; rather, they project an aura of bureaucratic hostility and dystopian surveillance. Consequently, municipal governments worldwide have faced immense public pressure to demolish these monolithic structures. What was initially conceived as a liberating aesthetic is now widely condemned by the public as oppressive, leading to the erasure of countless Brutalist civic centers.

The relationship between the original intent behind Brutalism as described in Passage A and the modern public's reception of it as described in Passage B is most structurally analogous to which of the following scenarios?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A software developer releases a free, strictly standardized operating system intended to liberate users from corporate control, but users find the interface so intimidating and inflexible that they feel oppressed by it.

Answer

The correct answer is the scenario where a developer creates an operating system to liberate users, but the users find it so inflexible they feel oppressed.
The correct answer perfectly maps the structural relationship found in the two passages. Just as the architects introduced a raw, unornamented design (Brutalism) to liberate and equalize citizens, the developer introduces a strictly standardized design (the OS) to liberate users. In both cases, the intended beneficiaries subjectively experience the uncompromising design not as liberating, but as hostile, intimidating, and oppressive.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Passage A to determine the creator's original intent.
Brutalist architects intended their unornamented concrete buildings to be utopian, egalitarian, and democratically transparent.
Understanding the baseline intent is the first half of the comparative relationship.
2
Analyze Passage B to determine the public's reception of the creation.
The public perceives these same buildings as projecting bureaucratic hostility and dystopian surveillance.
This establishes the second half of the relationship: the actual reception directly contrasts with the egalitarian intent.
3
Abstract the relationship into a general logical structure.
A creator designs something with the intent of liberating and equalizing people, but the intended beneficiaries find the design so harsh that they feel oppressed by it.
Abstracting the core dynamic allows for mapping it to entirely different subject matter.
4
Evaluate the answer choices against this abstracted logical structure.
The scenario involving the software developer perfectly matches: a liberating intent is subjectively experienced as oppressive and intimidating by the users.
Only one option accurately maps both the specific intent and the precise nature of the unintended reception without altering the logical flow.

Key Concept

Comparative Analogies
Question 10Question →

Passage A
In musical performance, free improvisation differs fundamentally from executing a classical composition. While a classical musician closely follows a pre-written, fixed score to replicate the composer's exact intentions, an improvising jazz musician relies on an internalized vocabulary of scales. The jazz musician spontaneously adapts this vocabulary in real-time, responding dynamically to the unpredictable choices made by other musicians on stage.

Passage B
Legal systems generally rely on one of two foundational models. In a civil law system, judges apply a comprehensive, codified set of statutes; their role is strictly to execute the written laws as intended by the legislature. Conversely, in a common law system, judges build the law incrementally. They draw upon established precedents—a foundational vocabulary of past rulings—and adapt them to the unique, unforeseen circumstances of the specific case before them.

Based on the passages above, match each element of musical performance from Passage A with its structurally analogous element in the legal systems described in Passage B.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

A pre-written, fixed classical score
An internalized vocabulary of musical scales
The unpredictable choices made by other musicians
A classical musician executing the composer's intentions

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The classical score maps to codified statutes; musical scales map to established precedents; the choices of other musicians map to the circumstances of a specific case; and the classical musician maps to the civil law judge.
The correct pairings rely on identifying the functional roles of the elements in each passage's dualistic framework. Passage A contrasts strict execution (classical score/musician) with flexible adaptation (scales/jazz musician responding to other players). Passage B mirrors this structure precisely: strict execution (statutes/civil judge) contrasts with flexible adaptation (precedents/common law judge responding to a new case). Therefore, the rigid rules (score/statutes) match, the rigid rule-followers (classical musician/civil judge) match, the flexible foundations (scales/precedents) match, and the dynamic variables demanding adaptation (other musicians' choices/specific case circumstances) match.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structural relationship in Passage A
Identified two paradigms: fixed execution (classical musician following a score) versus dynamic adaptation (jazz musician adapting scales to unpredictable choices).
To establish the functional roles of the elements in the first domain.
2
Analyze the structural relationship in Passage B
Identified two corresponding paradigms: fixed execution (civil judge applying codified statutes) versus dynamic adaptation (common law judge adapting precedents to unique case circumstances).
To establish the functional roles of the elements in the second domain.
3
Map the static/fixed elements across passages
The 'fixed classical score' maps to the 'codified set of statutes', and the 'classical musician' maps to the 'civil law judge'.
Both sets share the structural function of strict adherence to pre-written rules.
4
Map the dynamic/adaptive elements across passages
The 'vocabulary of musical scales' maps to 'established precedents', and the 'unpredictable choices' map to the 'unforeseen circumstances of a case'.
Both sets share the structural function of providing a flexible foundation that is shaped by immediate, unique variables.

Key Concept

Identifying structural parallels between analogous systems with contrasting fixed and adaptive components.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Comparative Analogies Practice Questions — LSAT | Examkin