Question

Difficulty: MediumDetermining Statement Roles

Read the following argument regarding developmental psychology. Match each extracted statement from the argument on the left to its exact logical function within the argument on the right.

Argument:
Developmental psychologists often assert that children possess an innate understanding of fairness. However, this assertion overlooks the critical role of early socialization. If an innate sense of fairness existed independently of social conditioning, toddlers raised with limited peer contact would demonstrate equitable behavior when finally integrated into social groups. Yet, observational studies show these children consistently hoard shared resources. Therefore, the concept of fairness must be primarily acquired through social interaction, even if a rudimentary predisposition toward empathy is genetically hardwired.

  • Children possess an innate understanding of fairness.A viewpoint that the argument as a whole is designed to reject.
  • If an innate sense of fairness existed independently of social conditioning, toddlers raised with limited peer contact would demonstrate equitable behavior when finally integrated into social groups.A conditional premise used to establish a behavioral expectation for a competing theory.
  • Observational studies show these children consistently hoard shared resources.Empirical evidence presented to demonstrate that a consequence of an opposing claim fails to materialize.
  • The concept of fairness must be primarily acquired through social interaction.The primary conclusion drawn by the argument.

Answer

The statement about an innate understanding of fairness matches the rejected viewpoint. The conditional statement about toddlers demonstrating equitable behavior matches the behavioral expectation premise. The statement about studies showing children hoarding resources matches the empirical evidence. The statement that fairness is primarily acquired through social interaction matches the primary conclusion.
Each statement plays a highly specific role: the first is the target of the author's critique, the second sets up a logical test for that target, the third provides the empirical data failing that test, and the final statement draws the ultimate deduction from this failure.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The final sentence stating that fairness must be primarily acquired through social interaction is the main conclusion, indicated by the keyword 'Therefore'.
Locating the main conclusion first provides an anchor to understand how all other statements function in relation to it.
2
Analyze the first statement regarding children possessing an innate understanding of fairness.
This is attributed to 'developmental psychologists' and is immediately countered by 'However, this assertion overlooks...', meaning it is the opposing claim the author rejects.
Understanding the target of the author's criticism clarifies the context of the subsequent evidence.
3
Evaluate the structural role of the 'If... then...' statement.
This statement creates a hypothetical scenario that tests the validity of the opposing claim.
Conditional statements in refutations are typically used to show what false consequence would follow from the opponent's premise.
4
Determine the function of the observational studies statement.
This statement provides the real-world evidence that the hypothetical consequence does not happen (children hoard rather than share), which triggers the rejection of the opposing claim.
Identifying empirical evidence helps separate factual support from theoretical claims.

Key Concept

Determining Statement Roles in an Argument
Rate this question