City Council Member: To reduce the severe traffic congestion on Main Street during rush hour, we should implement a toll for driving on that road during peak times. People strongly dislike paying tolls, so they will choose alternative routes. This behavioral shift will successfully ease the traffic on Main Street.
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- AEvery driver who currently uses Main Street during rush hour has a viable alternative route available to them.
- BThe revenue generated by the new toll will be used to improve the condition of alternative routes.
- CDrivers do not actually dislike paying tolls as much as the city council member claims.
- At least some drivers who currently use Main Street during rush hour have alternative routes available to them.Answer
- EMost drivers will refuse to pay the toll even if they do not have any alternative routes available to them.
Answer
The correct assumption is that at least some drivers who use Main Street have alternative routes available to them.
This statement is logically required by the argument. Using the Negation Technique, if we negate 'at least some' to 'none', we get: 'No drivers who currently use Main Street during rush hour have alternative routes available to them.' If this were true, drivers would be forced to stay on Main Street despite the toll, meaning the traffic would not be eased through the mechanism described. Because negating this statement destroys the argument's conclusion, it is a strictly necessary assumption.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Applying the Negation Technique to Necessary Assumptions
Estimated Time:1m 0s