Question

Difficulty: EasyAuthor's Attitude and Tone

Read the following excerpt and evaluate the statement below.

Excerpt:
While structural functionalism offered mid-20th-century sociologists a beautifully symmetric framework for understanding institutional stability, its primary architects completely ignored the historical friction of social inequality. It is tempting to admire the sheer elegance of the functionalist model, but its insistence on viewing societal conflict as a mere 'temporary system imbalance' renders it practically useless for analyzing the civil rights movements that followed.

Statement:
The author's attitude toward structural functionalism can be accurately described as a complete rejection of both its theoretical aesthetic and its practical utility.

Answer: Answer

Answer

False
The statement is false because it overstates the author's negativity by using the extreme phrase 'complete rejection of both.' While the author forcefully rejects the practical utility of structural functionalism (calling it 'practically useless'), they explicitly admire its theoretical aesthetic (calling it a 'beautifully symmetric framework' with 'sheer elegance').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage for phrases indicating the author's attitude toward the theory's aesthetic and theoretical qualities.
The author uses positive, admiring phrases like 'beautifully symmetric framework' and 'sheer elegance'.
Identifying the valence (positive/negative) of specific tone-revealing words is necessary to determine the author's stance on the theoretical aspect.
2
Analyze the passage for phrases indicating the author's attitude toward the theory's practical utility.
The author uses strongly negative phrases like 'completely ignored' and 'practically useless'.
This establishes the author's contrasting stance on the real-world application of the theory.
3
Evaluate the given statement against the findings from the text.
The statement claims a 'complete rejection' of both aspects. Because the theoretical aesthetic was explicitly praised, the statement is false.
A statement accurately characterizing an author's tone must reflect all parts of the author's stance, including mixed or qualified views.

Key Concept

Identifying nuanced authorial tone and qualified stances
Rate this question