City Planner: In order for the municipality to achieve its statutory carbon-reduction targets by 2030, the transit department must replace all diesel-powered municipal buses with zero-emission electric vehicles. According to recent procurement records, the transit department will successfully complete this transition to an all-electric fleet before the end of 2028. Thus, we can be confident that the municipality will achieve its statutory carbon-reduction targets by 2030.
Which of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the city planner's reasoning?
- Arejects the possibility that municipal carbon emissions could be reduced through methods other than electrifying the bus fleet
- treats a condition that is required for achieving an outcome as though it were sufficient to guarantee that outcomeAnswer
- Crelies on an assumption that all other municipal departments will always fail to reduce their carbon output
- Dmistakes an intermediate conclusion regarding bus fleet procurement for the main conclusion of the argument
- Edisputes the factual accuracy of the procurement records without providing contradictory evidence
Answer
The argument is flawed because it treats a condition that is necessary for achieving an outcome as though it were sufficient to guarantee that outcome.
The premise sets up bus electrification as a prerequisite (a necessary condition) for achieving statutory carbon-reduction targets. By inferring that completing this electrification project ensures the attainment of the overarching targets, the speaker mistakenly treats a necessary condition as a sufficient one. Other sectors or municipal emissions sources could still cause the city to fall short of its overall targets.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Distinguishing Necessary from Sufficient Conditions
Estimated Time:1m 20s