Question

Difficulty: EasyFlaw in the Reasoning

Company President: The union leaders argue that our factory workers deserve significantly better healthcare benefits because the company has experienced unprecedented growth over the last three fiscal years. However, this argument fundamentally misunderstands reality. Growth is strictly a biological process that involves cellular division and physical expansion over time. Because a manufacturing corporation is clearly not a living biological organism, it cannot possibly undergo growth. Therefore, the union's premise is completely unfounded.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the company president's reasoning?

  1. A
    It takes for granted that a statistical association between two phenomena proves a causal relationship.
  2. B
    It incorrectly infers that a characteristic belonging to the parts of a corporation must also belong to the whole corporation.
  3. It trades on the use of a single term in two entirely different senses.Answer
  4. D
    It mistakes a condition that is necessary for biological expansion for a condition that guarantees such expansion.
  5. E
    It fails to distinguish between a subsidiary conclusion and the final conclusion of the union's argument.

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that the argument trades on the use of a single term in two entirely different senses.
The correct answer accurately identifies the equivocation flaw. The union leaders use the word 'growth' in a common economic sense (e.g., increased revenue, expansion of operations), while the company president deliberately shifts the meaning to a strictly biological sense (cellular division) in order to dismiss the union's claim. Using one word to mean two fundamentally different things in the same argument is a classic logical fallacy known as equivocation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the author's main conclusion.
The conclusion is that the union's premise about the company experiencing growth is completely unfounded.
Understanding the conclusion helps pinpoint what the author is ultimately trying to prove.
2
Identify the evidence used to support the conclusion.
The author defines growth strictly as a biological process of cellular division, and notes that a corporation is not a biological organism.
Isolating the premises reveals how the author attempts to logically justify the conclusion.
3
Evaluate the relationship between the premises and the conclusion to find the logical gap.
The author intentionally shifts the definition of 'growth'. The union meant economic growth, but the author attacks the claim using biological growth.
Recognizing this shift in meaning exposes the equivocation fallacy at the heart of the argument.

Key Concept

Equivocation Fallacy
Rate this question