Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardFlaw in the Reasoning

Financial Analyst: For a startup tech enterprise to secure institutional Series B venture funding, it is imperative that its net recurring revenue has expanded by at least 100 percent annually over the preceding two fiscal quarters. Furthermore, any firm that manages to expand its recurring revenue at such a rapid pace must possess proprietary intellectual property that creates substantial barriers to market entry. Therefore, because CloudSphere Technologies holds several patented software algorithms that prevent competitors from entering its market space, CloudSphere will inevitably obtain Series B funding in the coming round.

The financial analyst's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

  1. A
    generalizes about the operational requirements of all enterprise technology firms from an unrepresentative sample of startup companies
  2. B
    presumes without warrant that patented software algorithms are completely impervious to competitive circumvention
  3. treats a condition that is necessary for securing funding as though it were sufficient to guarantee that fundingAnswer
  4. D
    confuses an intermediate deduction regarding revenue expansion with the primary conclusion of the argument
  5. E
    relies on extreme language that equates a high probability of institutional investment with an absolute certainty

Answer

The argument commits a conditional reasoning error by treating a necessary condition for obtaining funding as a sufficient condition that guarantees funding.
The correct response accurately captures the structural error in the argument: the premises demonstrate that proprietary intellectual property is an indispensable requirement (necessary condition) for Series B funding, but the author fallaciously infers that meeting this requirement ensures that the funding will be received (treating it as a sufficient condition).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the formal conditional structure of the premises
Premise 1 establishes: Securing Series B funding →\rightarrow Rapid revenue growth (≥100%\ge 100\%). Premise 2 establishes: Rapid revenue growth →\rightarrow Proprietary intellectual property. Combining these yields the conditional requirement: Securing Series B funding →\rightarrow Proprietary intellectual property.
Deconstructing conditional relationships into formal logic exposes the necessary prerequisites for the outcome.
2
Examine the relationship between the premises and the conclusion
The analyst observes that CloudSphere satisfies the final necessary condition (holding proprietary intellectual property) and infers that CloudSphere must achieve the initial condition (securing Series B funding).
This establishes that the author asserts B→AB \rightarrow A based solely on the conditional rule A→BA \rightarrow B.
3
Identify the logical flaw
The argument commits a classic Mistaken Reversal (confusing necessity with sufficiency), falsely assuming that meeting an essential requirement is enough to guarantee the end result.
Matching the structural gap between premise and conclusion identifies the exact logical vulnerability.

Key Concept

Mistaken Reversal / Confusing Necessary and Sufficient Conditions
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Flaw in the Reasoning

More questions from this topic