Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardPoints of Disagreement

Read the following two passages regarding Neanderthal cognition.

Passage A
The recent dating of Iberian cave paintings to over 60,000 years ago—predating the arrival of *Homo sapiens* in Europe—forces a radical reevaluation of Neanderthal cognition. The deliberate application of pigment to create non-utilitarian representations provides unequivocal evidence of abstract symbolic thought. In hominins, the capacity for abstract symbolism is inextricably bound to recursive cognitive operations—the ability to embed concepts within concepts. Because syntactically structured language serves as the primary neurological substrate for such recursive processing, we must conclude that it is highly probable Neanderthals possessed syntactic language. The paintings are not mere aesthetic anomalies; they are fossilized evidence of a mind capable of complex grammatical structure.

Passage B
Some researchers have eagerly seized upon the discovery of Neanderthal cave art in Spain to argue that these hominins possessed fully syntactic language. This conclusion drastically outpaces the archaeological evidence. It is undeniable that the deliberate use of pigments to mark cave walls indicates a capacity for symbolic behavior. However, we must resist the temptation to conflate rudimentary symbolic artifact production with the recursive cognitive architecture required for syntax. Extensive studies of both modern human skill acquisition and primate behavior demonstrate that the creation and cultural transmission of symbolic practices, such as cave marking, can be sustained entirely through mimetic communication—imitation, gesture, and shared attention. Such practices do not require recursive cognitive operations. Therefore, while the Iberian paintings confirm Neanderthal symbolism, they remain entirely silent on the question of their syntactic linguistic capacities.

Based on the passages, the authors would be most likely to disagree over which of the following statements?

  1. The creation of non-utilitarian symbolic representations fundamentally relies upon cognitive operations that are recursive in nature.Answer
  2. B
    Neanderthals possessed the cognitive capacity to engage in deliberate symbolic behaviors.
  3. C
    Neanderthals definitively communicated using fully developed, syntactically structured spoken language.
  4. D
    Syntactically structured language is the primary neurological substrate for recursive cognitive processing in hominins.
  5. E
    The capacity for complex grammatical structure is inextricably bound to the cultural transmission of advanced toolmaking.

Answer

The authors disagree over whether the creation of non-utilitarian symbolic representations fundamentally relies upon cognitive operations that are recursive in nature.
The correct answer accurately captures the central point of contention between the two authors. The author of Passage A argues that abstract symbolism—specifically the creation of non-utilitarian representations—is 'inextricably bound to recursive cognitive operations.' In direct contrast, the author of Passage B argues that the 'creation and cultural transmission of symbolic practices... do not require recursive cognitive operations.' Therefore, they fundamentally disagree on whether the creation of such art inherently relies on recursive cognition.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Passage A's core argument and identified premises.
Passage A argues that Neanderthals likely had syntactic language because they created cave art, which requires abstract symbolism, which in turn depends on recursive cognitive operations.
Understanding the chain of reasoning in Passage A is necessary to identify what specific claims the author is committed to.
2
Analyze Passage B's core argument and identified premises.
Passage B agrees Neanderthals created symbolic art but argues this does not prove syntactic language, because the creation of such art does not require recursive cognitive operations.
Comparing Passage B's premises to Passage A's premises reveals the exact point of divergence.
3
Compare the two arguments to pinpoint the precise disagreement.
Passage A explicitly claims that creating symbolic art requires recursive cognitive operations, whereas Passage B explicitly denies this, stating it can be sustained without recursive operations.
A valid point of disagreement must be a statement where the two authors hold definitively opposing views based on the text.

Key Concept

Identifying Precise Points of Disagreement in Complex Arguments
Rate this question

Topics

Points of Disagreement

More questions from this topic