Question

Difficulty: MediumWeaken

Match each brief argument with the specific piece of new evidence that most effectively weakens its conclusion.

  • A university study found that students who take notes by hand score higher on exams than those who type. Thus, handwriting notes causes better academic performance.Students who choose to take notes by hand generally possess higher baseline motivation, a trait that independently leads to higher exam scores.
  • After the regional government introduced a subsidy for solar panels, carbon emissions dropped by 15%. This proves the subsidy was highly effective.In the same year the subsidy was introduced, a severe economic recession caused heavy industrial manufacturing in the region to decline drastically.
  • A poll at a tech industry conference revealed that 85% of attendees believe AI will create jobs. Therefore, the general public is optimistic about AI.Professionals in the technology sector are significantly more likely than the average citizen to benefit financially from the expansion of artificial intelligence.
  • Over the last five years, workplace accidents involving robotic arms have tripled, while accidents involving human workers decreased. Clearly, robotic arms are becoming less safe.During the last five years, factories have aggressively automated, replacing 80% of their human assembly workers with robotic arms.

Answer

Argument 1 matches Evidence C. Argument 2 matches Evidence A. Argument 3 matches Evidence D. Argument 4 matches Evidence B.
Each correct pairing effectively targets the specific logical vulnerability in the corresponding argument: Argument 1 is weakened by an alternate cause for a correlation; Argument 2 is weakened by an independent alternate cause for an outcome; Argument 3 is weakened by exposing sample bias; and Argument 4 is weakened by providing context on population size changes (base rate).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Argument 1 (Note-taking)
Identified a correlation-to-causation flaw. Look for evidence providing an alternate explanation for the correlation.
Evidence C shows that the motivation level of the students is the true cause of the higher scores, not the physical act of note-taking.
2
Analyze Argument 2 (Solar subsidy)
Identified a chronological correlation assumed to be causal. Look for an alternate cause for the emissions drop.
Evidence A provides a strong alternate cause: a decline in manufacturing due to a recession, weakening the claim that the subsidy was responsible.
3
Analyze Argument 3 (AI poll)
Identified a sampling flaw. The sample (tech attendees) is not representative of the conclusion's target group (the general public).
Evidence D highlights why this specific sample is inherently biased compared to the general public, destroying the argument's validity.
4
Analyze Argument 4 (Robotic accidents)
Identified a numbers vs. proportions flaw. An absolute increase in accidents doesn't mean safety decreased if usage also increased massively.
Evidence B shows the number of robots increased drastically, which naturally leads to more total accidents even if the rate of accidents per robot remained safe or improved.

Key Concept

Identifying and targeting specific logical vulnerabilities (causation errors, unrepresentative samples, and base rate neglect) to weaken arguments.
Rate this question

Topics