All practice questions

3960 questions

Question 1661Question →

Read the following passage:

"The prevailing view among architectural historians is that the shift from Gothic to Renaissance architecture was driven primarily by aesthetic rediscovery. However, this perspective overlooks the crucial role of changing economic structures in the 15th century. The concentration of wealth among mercantile elites in cities like Florence created a new class of patrons. Unlike the Church, whose patronage favored the communal and vertically oriented Gothic structures meant to inspire religious awe, these new mercantile patrons sought buildings that reflected their personal wealth, rationality, and civic prominence. Consequently, they favored the symmetrical, human-scaled proportions of the classical style, which implicitly celebrated individual achievement and earthly order. Therefore, the architectural transformation of the Renaissance should be understood not merely as an aesthetic evolution, but fundamentally as the spatial manifestation of a shifting economic power dynamic."

Arrange the following claims from the passage in their logical hierarchy of support, from the most foundational supporting premise (first) to the overarching main point of the passage (last).

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct hierarchy begins with the foundational fact (wealth concentration), moves to the first intermediate claim (patrons seeking civic prominence), then to the second intermediate claim (favoring classical style), and ends with the main conclusion (the architectural shift was fundamentally driven by economic power dynamics).
The correct ordering reflects the logical structure of the author's argument. The argument begins with a foundational historical fact: the concentration of wealth. This fact logically supports an intermediate claim about the resulting motivations of this new wealthy class (seeking civic prominence). Their motivation supports the next intermediate claim about their specific aesthetic choices (favoring the classical style). Finally, these interconnected premises collectively support the author's overarching thesis: that the shift to Renaissance architecture was fundamentally a manifestation of economic power.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the foundational factual premise that initiates the author's argument.
The statement about wealth concentration among mercantile elites is the unargued historical fact that acts as the starting point of the causal chain.
Foundational premises form the base of the argument's support structure and do not rely on other claims in the text.
2
Trace the intermediate claims that link the foundational fact to the ultimate conclusion.
The wealth concentration led to the patrons' desire for civic prominence (first intermediate claim), which in turn caused them to specifically favor the classical architectural style (second intermediate claim).
Intermediate claims act as logical bridges, being supported by earlier foundational facts while providing direct evidence for the final conclusion.
3
Identify the author's overarching conclusion (main point) in the passage.
The passage ultimately argues that the architectural transformation was fundamentally driven by a shifting economic power dynamic, making this the main conclusion.
The main point is the ultimate, broadest claim that all other premises and intermediate claims are designed to support.

Key Concept

Distinguishing Main Point from Subsidiary Points by analyzing the hierarchy of logical support
Question 1662Question →

A recent municipal initiative in the city of Belmont provided heavy subsidies for homeowners to install high-efficiency solar panels. Within two years, over 60 percent of households adopted the panels, drastically reducing their reliance on the city's main electrical grid during daylight hours. However, the total amount of coal burned by the city's central power plant—its sole source of electricity generation—actually increased by 15 percent over the same two-year period.

The apparent logical discrepancy in this scenario is that the total amount of coal burned by the city's central power plant increased by 15 percent, even though the total amount of electricity consumed by Belmont households decreased over the same two-year period.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False
The statement is false because it mischaracterizes the given facts by shifting the scope. The stimulus explicitly states that reliance on the grid during daylight hours decreased, but it never states that total electricity consumption decreased. A correct identification of the apparent discrepancy must rely solely on the facts explicitly presented in the text.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus to identify the two explicitly stated conflicting facts.
Fact 1: Over 60 percent of households drastically reduced their reliance on the grid during daylight hours. Fact 2: The total amount of coal burned by the central power plant increased by 15 percent.
Isolating the precise factual premises is required to accurately identify the logical discrepancy without making outside assumptions.
2
Examine the proposed discrepancy statement for accuracy.
The statement claims the tension exists because total electricity consumed by households decreased while coal burned increased.
The proposed statement must perfectly match the facts provided in the stimulus to be correct.
3
Compare the facts in the proposed statement to the facts in the stimulus.
The stimulus discusses 'reliance on the main electrical grid during daylight hours', whereas the statement shifts the scope to 'total amount of electricity consumed'.
Identifying subtle scope shifts is critical for evaluating LSAT logical reasoning statements.

Key Concept

Identifying the Apparent Discrepancy
Question 1663Question →

Historian: Any society that maintains a standing professional army must divert a substantial portion of its agricultural surplus to the state. However, diverting a substantial portion of agricultural surplus to the state inevitably suppresses the development of an independent merchant class. Therefore, if an ancient society featured a flourishing independent merchant class, it must not have possessed heavily fortified urban centers.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian's argument depends?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Any society that possesses heavily fortified urban centers also maintains a standing professional army.

Answer

The argument depends on the assumption that any society that possesses heavily fortified urban centers also maintains a standing professional army.
The historian establishes a logical chain: maintaining a standing army leads to diverting surplus, which in turn suppresses an independent merchant class. By contrapositive, if a society has a flourishing independent merchant class, it must NOT have a standing professional army. However, the historian's conclusion jumps to stating that such a society must not have 'heavily fortified urban centers.' For this conclusion to logically follow from the fact that they lack a standing army, the argument must assume a connection between the two: specifically, that having heavily fortified urban centers requires having a standing professional army. If we negate this correct statement ('A society can possess heavily fortified urban centers without maintaining a standing professional army'), the historian's conclusion completely falls apart.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Map the formal logic of the premises.
Premise 1: Standing Army -> Divert Surplus. Premise 2: Divert Surplus -> Suppressed Merchant Class. Chain: Standing Army -> Suppressed Merchant Class.
Tracking the conditional statements reveals what the author has successfully proven so far.
2
Map the formal logic of the conclusion.
Conclusion: Flourishing Merchant Class (Not Suppressed) -> No Heavily Fortified Urban Centers.
This exposes the exact claim the author is trying to make based on the premises.
3
Identify the logical gap (rogue element).
The premises prove that a Flourishing Merchant Class -> No Standing Army (by contrapositive). However, the conclusion claims Flourishing Merchant Class -> No Heavily Fortified Urban Centers.
Finding the mismatch between what is proven and what is concluded isolates the missing link.
4
Formulate the required bridging assumption.
To jump from 'No Standing Army' to 'No Heavily Fortified Urban Centers', the argument must assume: No Standing Army -> No Heavily Fortified Urban Centers. The contrapositive of this is: Heavily Fortified Urban Centers -> Standing Army.
A Supporter Assumption must connect the rogue term in the conclusion back to the framework established in the premises.

Key Concept

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions in Formal Logic
Question 1664Question →

Whenever the ocean temperature in a region remains above 30 degrees Celsius for an extended period, the local coral reefs undergo severe bleaching. Marine biologists have recently reported severe bleaching in the northern barrier reefs. Therefore, it is certain that the ocean temperature in the northern barrier region recently remained above 30 degrees Celsius for an extended period.

Which one of the following arguments exhibits a flawed pattern of reasoning most similar to that in the argument above?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The patient must be consuming an excessive amount of refined sugar. After all, the patient's medical chart indicates rapid fluctuations in blood glucose, and anyone who consumes an excessive amount of refined sugar experiences such rapid fluctuations.

Answer

The argument concluding that a patient must be consuming excessive sugar based on rapid blood glucose fluctuations is the correct answer.
The correct answer accurately mirrors the logical flaw in the stimulus: an illegal reversal of a conditional statement. The stimulus states 'If High Temp -> Bleaching', observes 'Bleaching', and falsely concludes 'High Temp'. The correct option states 'If High Sugar -> Fluctuations', observes 'Fluctuations', and falsely concludes 'High Sugar'. Furthermore, it successfully varies the order of the premises and conclusion to ensure a structural, rather than superficial, match.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the logical structure of the stimulus argument.
Premise 1: If extended temp > 30°C (Sufficient), then severe bleaching (Necessary). Premise 2: Severe bleaching occurred. Conclusion: Temp > 30°C occurred.
Identifying the precise components of the conditional statement is required to determine the exact nature of the flaw.
2
Identify the logical flaw committed in the stimulus.
The argument commits an illegal reversal (also known as confusing a necessary condition for a sufficient condition). It assumes that the presence of the necessary outcome guarantees the presence of the sufficient trigger.
A parallel flaw question requires matching the specific abstract error in reasoning, not just the general topic.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the identical structural flaw, ignoring topic similarities and sentence order.
The argument regarding refined sugar and blood glucose perfectly matches the structure: 'If Sugar (Sufficient), then Fluctuations (Necessary). Fluctuations occurred. Therefore, Sugar occurred.' The other choices exhibit valid reasoning, illegal negation, quantifier errors, or causal flaws.
The correct answer must replicate the abstract logical error exactly, regardless of the subject matter or the order in which the premises and conclusion are presented.

Key Concept

Parallel Flaw - Illegal Reversal
Question 1665Question →

The legendary account of the first screening of the Lumière brothers' *L'Arrivée d'un train en gare de La Ciotat* in 1895 holds that audiences, terrified by the oncoming locomotive, fled the theater in a panic. For decades, this anecdote has been uncritically reproduced in film histories as definitive proof of the overwhelming, unprecedented realism of the new medium. According to this narrative, early spectators lacked the visual literacy to distinguish projected images from physical reality, making them uniquely susceptible to the illusion of the moving image.

However, archival research into the era's press clippings and police records yields no contemporary evidence of such a stampede. In reality, the myth of the panicking spectator was not a spontaneous historical occurrence, but rather a deliberate discursive construction synthesized years later by film promoters to validate cinema as a visceral, autonomous art form distinct from traditional theater. By cultivating the legend of a medium so powerful it could bypass rational thought, the nascent film industry successfully positioned the cinematic apparatus itself—rather than the mundane subjects it recorded—as the primary spectacle. Therefore, the terror of the first audiences tells us less about early cognitive responses to film than it does about the sophisticated marketing strategies necessary to institutionalize cinema.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The widely repeated story of audiences panicking at a Lumière brothers' film is not a factual historical event, but a retroactive myth constructed by promoters to legitimize the cinematic medium.

Answer

The widely repeated story of audiences panicking at a Lumière brothers' film is not a factual historical event, but a retroactive myth constructed by promoters to legitimize the cinematic medium.
This option accurately captures the author's overarching thesis, located in the second paragraph. The author explicitly argues that the anecdote of the fleeing audience is a 'deliberate discursive construction' created by promoters to 'validate cinema' rather than an actual historical event demonstrating visual illiteracy.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the topic and the primary debate.
The passage discusses the famous anecdote of audiences fleeing a Lumière brothers' film, contrasting the traditional historical belief with new archival evidence.
Understanding the subject matter and the conflict is the first step in reading comprehension.
2
Locate the author's explicit thesis.
The thesis is found in the second paragraph: 'the myth of the panicking spectator was not a spontaneous historical occurrence, but rather a deliberate discursive construction synthesized years later by film promoters to validate cinema'.
Explicit main point questions require finding the exact sentence where the author states their central, unifying claim.
3
Evaluate the options against the explicit thesis.
The correct option captures the claim that the panic story is an invented marketing myth meant to validate cinema, rather than a historical fact of audience illiteracy.
Matching the explicit thesis to the answer choices ensures the selected option captures the overall argument without being too broad, too narrow, or confusing the main point with the passage's purpose.

Key Concept

Explicit Main Point Identification
Question 1666Question →

Consider the following historical discrepancy:

Between 1300 and 1350 CE, the ancient settlement of Qalhat experienced a massive population boom and a significant expansion of its stone infrastructure. However, geological records indicate that during this exact same fifty-year period, the region's only nearby freshwater reservoir shrank drastically, reducing the local water supply to less than a third of its previous capacity.

Match each of the following hypothetical findings to its logical function in relation to this apparent discrepancy.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Excavations reveal that an extended period of lower-than-average precipitation in the broader geographic basin led to a steady drop in the regional water table during the fourteenth century.
The majority of the new stone infrastructure built during this period consisted of deep subterranean cisterns that allowed the settlement to capture and efficiently store heavy, seasonal monsoon rains for year-round use.
In 1301 CE, the settlement became the administrative capital of a newly unified empire, which mandated that all regional trade pass through the city's newly constructed stone markets.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The precipitation finding explains only the reduced water supply. The cisterns finding reconciles the discrepancy. The administrative capital finding explains only the population boom.
A valid resolution to a paradox must act as a bridge between the two conflicting facts. The finding regarding the subterranean cisterns is the only one that achieves this, demonstrating how the infrastructure boom itself bypassed the need for the shrinking reservoir. The other findings represent classic one-sided traps: one explains the drought while ignoring the population growth, and the other explains the population growth while ignoring the drought.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the two conflicting premises that create the discrepancy.
Premise A is the population and infrastructure boom. Premise B is the drastically shrinking freshwater reservoir.
Resolving a paradox requires clearly isolating the two facts that appear to contradict each other.
2
Evaluate the precipitation finding against both premises.
It provides a cause for the shrinking reservoir (Premise B) but leaves the population boom (Premise A) unexplained in the face of a drought.
An explanation that only addresses one side of a discrepancy does not resolve the paradox.
3
Evaluate the cisterns finding against both premises.
It reveals that the new infrastructure captured alternate water sources (monsoons), bridging the gap between population growth and the loss of the reservoir.
A true resolution must provide a mechanism that allows both apparently conflicting premises to coexist logically.
4
Evaluate the administrative capital finding against both premises.
It explains the cause of the population and infrastructure boom (Premise A) but entirely ignores the constraint of the shrinking water supply (Premise B).
Identifying the catalyst for growth does not explain how that growth was sustained without water.

Key Concept

Eliminating one-sided explanations in paradox questions by ensuring the correct answer accounts for both conflicting premises.
Question 1667Question →

Read the following argument carefully:

Historians recently discovered that the sudden collapse of the prosperous Toralian trade network in the 12th century coincided precisely with a massive volcanic eruption. Because the eruption covered the Toralian region's primary agricultural centers in thick ash, researchers conclude that the eruption caused the trade network's collapse by devastating the local food supply.

Evaluate the following statement:

The newly uncovered historical record showing that a neighboring civilization—which was completely spared from the volcanic ash fall—maintained a thriving, uninterrupted trade network throughout the entire 12th century actively weakens the researchers' conclusion.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

The statement is False because the newly presented evidence strengthens, rather than weakens, the causal argument.
The statement is false because the new historical evidence demonstrates a scenario where the absence of the proposed cause (volcanic ash) is correlated with the absence of the effect (trade network collapse). In causal logic, this functions as a control case that strengthens the conclusion. Since the evidence strengthens the argument, the assertion that it 'actively weakens' the conclusion is false.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the original argument to identify the premises and the exact conclusion.
Premise: Eruption coincided with collapse and covered agricultural centers in ash. Conclusion: The eruption caused the trade network's collapse.
Understanding the core causal claim is necessary before evaluating how new evidence impacts it.
2
Analyze the nature of the newly uncovered historical record provided in the statement.
The new evidence presents a scenario where the cause is absent (no volcanic ash fall) and the effect is absent (the trade network did not collapse, but remained thriving).
Accurately summarizing the new evidence ensures it is compared correctly against the original causal relationship.
3
Determine the logical impact of this 'no cause -> no effect' scenario on the original causal claim.
The evidence acts as a control group, ruling out the possibility that a broader regional factor (like a widespread economic depression or general climate shift) caused the collapse, thereby supporting the conclusion that the ash was the specific culprit.
In formal logical reasoning, demonstrating that the absence of a cause correlates with the absence of an effect strengthens a causal argument.
4
Evaluate the accuracy of the final statement based on the logical impact.
Because the evidence strengthens the argument, the statement claiming that it 'actively weakens' the conclusion is mathematically and logically false.
This confirms the final truth value of the provided statement.

Key Concept

Evaluating Causal Arguments (Strengthen vs. Weaken)
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 1668Question →

Based on the passage below, match each perspective or group mentioned in the text with the statement that best captures its explicit main point regarding evolutionary biology.

Throughout the latter half of the twentieth century, the consensus within evolutionary biology, known as the Modern Synthesis, maintained that macroevolutionary changes are driven entirely by random genetic mutations acted upon by natural selection. According to this orthodox framework, the environment selects for advantageous traits, but it possesses no mechanism to directly induce heritable variations.

Recently, however, the discovery of epigenetic inheritance—mechanisms by which environmental factors alter gene expression without changing the underlying DNA sequence—has prompted some biologists to propose a neo-Lamarckian paradigm. These theorists contend that environmentally acquired characteristics can be passed directly across generations, thereby undermining the foundational primacy of random mutation in evolutionary development.

A more moderate faction champions the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES). Proponents of the EES argue that epigenetic inheritance does not invalidate the Modern Synthesis but rather operates parallel to it. In their view, epigenetic markers serve as an additional tier of heritable variation that must be integrated into standard evolutionary models to fully account for the speed of certain evolutionary adaptations.

Despite the enthusiasm surrounding these discoveries, a careful analysis of transgenerational epigenetic stability leads to a more constrained conclusion. Because epigenetic markers are typically reset after a few generations and lack the permanence of genetic mutations, epigenetic inheritance functions merely as a temporary adaptive buffer against rapid environmental fluctuations, rather than serving as an independent driver of long-term macroevolution.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Traditional Modern Synthesis proponents
Neo-Lamarckian theorists
Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) advocates
The author of the passage

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Traditional Modern Synthesis proponents match with the view that evolutionary change is exclusively the result of natural selection on random mutations. Neo-Lamarckian theorists match with the view that environmental factors trigger heritable adaptations. EES advocates match with the view that epigenetic mechanisms are an additional layer to be incorporated into existing frameworks. The author matches with the view that epigenetic expressions are transient, short-term survival mechanisms.
The correct matches successfully trace the four distinct perspectives presented in the passage. The Modern Synthesis relies solely on random mutations. Neo-Lamarckians believe environment directly causes heritable changes. EES advocates want to add epigenetics to the existing framework. Finally, the author explicitly argues in the last paragraph that epigenetics is merely a temporary buffer, not an independent driver of macroevolution.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the first paragraph to identify the main point of the Traditional Modern Synthesis.
The first paragraph explicitly states they believe macroevolution is 'driven entirely by random genetic mutations.' This matches the statement about change being exclusively the result of natural selection acting upon random DNA alterations.
Accurate viewpoint attribution requires matching the specific claims of a group to the paraphrased thesis.
2
Analyze the second paragraph to identify the main point of Neo-Lamarckian theorists.
They 'contend that environmentally acquired characteristics can be passed directly... undermining the foundational primacy of random mutation.' This aligns with the statement that environmental factors can directly trigger heritable adaptations.
This establishes the most radical counter-perspective presented in the passage.
3
Analyze the third paragraph to identify the main point of EES advocates.
They argue epigenetics 'does not invalidate the Modern Synthesis but rather operates parallel to it' as an 'additional tier.' This matches the statement about incorporating epigenetic mechanisms into existing frameworks.
Distinguishing the moderate EES view from the radical Neo-Lamarckian view is crucial.
4
Analyze the final paragraph to identify the author's explicit thesis.
The author concludes that 'epigenetic inheritance functions merely as a temporary adaptive buffer... rather than serving as an independent driver.' This directly matches the statement about epigenetic expressions being transient short-term survival mechanisms.
Identifying the author's explicit main point is the primary objective, distinct from the viewpoints they summarize.

Key Concept

Explicit Main Point Identification and Viewpoint Attribution
Question 1669Question →

For decades, the dominant paradigm in ecological conservation was the single-species approach, which focused resources on protecting apex predators or charismatic megafauna. This strategy was politically appealing because it offered highly measurable, immediate outcomes: a stabilized population of a specific endangered species could be easily quantified and communicated to the public. However, ecologists increasingly recognize that this approach is fundamentally inadequate in the face of rapid macro-environmental shifts. By treating ecosystems as static backgrounds rather than dynamic, interdependent networks, single-species conservation often fails to protect the underlying processes that sustain biodiversity. For instance, successfully stabilizing a specific avian population in a localized forest tract does little to ensure the ecosystem's survival if shifting wildfire regimes—a macro-level threat—fundamentally alter the forest's composition. Consequently, conservation biology has begun pivoting toward a landscape-level resilience model, which prioritizes the functional integrity of entire ecosystems over the survival of isolated species. While critics rightly point out that this holistic approach is bureaucratically cumbersome and lacks the immediate, headline-grabbing successes of the older model, such administrative difficulties are a necessary trade-off. Ultimately, because isolated conservation efforts are easily undone by systemic ecological collapse, embracing the complexity of landscape-level management represents the only viable path to securing long-term environmental stability.

Which of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Although the landscape-level resilience model presents administrative difficulties, it must replace the historically dominant single-species approach because only the former can secure long-term ecological stability.

Answer

The correct answer states that despite its bureaucratic drawbacks, the landscape-level resilience model is a necessary replacement for the single-species approach in order to ensure long-term environmental stability.
The correct answer perfectly encapsulates the author's primary argument. It acknowledges the shift from the old model to the new model, incorporates the author's concession that the new model is administratively difficult, and delivers the final judgment that this shift is imperative for long-term ecological stability.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage's structure to identify the author's primary argument.
The author introduces an old model (single-species), critiques its ecological flaws, introduces a new model (landscape-level), concedes its administrative flaws, and concludes that the new model is nevertheless necessary.
Understanding the structural flow helps separate the background context and supporting evidence from the final, synthesized conclusion.
2
Differentiate between supporting evidence (subsidiary points) and the overarching conclusion.
The political appeal of the old model and the specific example of the avian population are premises building toward the final sentence, which serves as the ultimate thesis.
Main point questions require selecting the answer that encompasses the entire argument, not just a factual sub-component.
3
Evaluate the options to find the one that synthesizes the entire argument.
The correct option captures the transition between the two models, the author's concession regarding bureaucracy, and the final judgment regarding necessity.
A complete main point must reflect the author's specific stance and the scope of the passage's conclusion.

Key Concept

Distinguishing the author's overarching thesis from the supporting premises and context used to build the argument.
Question 1670Question →

Venture Capitalist: For an emerging technology platform to attain mainstream consumer adoption, it is imperative that it both addresses a preexisting logistical friction and secures aggressive early-stage capitalization. The new decentralized delivery protocol, OmniTransit, has undeniably solved a major logistical friction in urban freight and has just closed a massive early-stage funding round. It is evident, then, that OmniTransit will inevitably achieve mainstream consumer adoption.

Which of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the venture capitalist's reasoning?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: takes for granted that satisfying the prerequisites for a phenomenon is all that is needed to bring about that phenomenon

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that the argument takes for granted that satisfying the prerequisites for a phenomenon is all that is needed to bring about that phenomenon.
The argument states that addressing friction and securing funding are 'imperative' (necessary prerequisites) for mainstream adoption. It then concludes that because OmniTransit has met these conditions, it will 'inevitably' achieve adoption (treating them as sufficient). The correct option accurately describes this confusion between necessary and sufficient conditions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that OmniTransit will inevitably achieve mainstream consumer adoption.
Finding the main conclusion is the first step in evaluating the reasoning.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
Premise 1: Mainstream adoption requires solving a logistical friction and securing early-stage capitalization. Premise 2: OmniTransit has solved a logistical friction and secured capitalization.
Understanding the evidence structure allows us to spot the logical leap.
3
Compare the premises to the conclusion to find the logical gap.
The argument states two requirements for success, observes that OmniTransit meets them, and concludes OmniTransit will therefore succeed.
This reveals whether the evidence actually guarantees the conclusion.
4
Characterize the logical flaw abstractly.
The author treats conditions that are necessary for an outcome (prerequisites) as if they are sufficient to guarantee that outcome.
Categorizing the abstract flaw helps in identifying the correct answer choice.

Key Concept

Necessary vs. Sufficient Condition Flaws
Question 1671Question →

Marine Biologist: Over the past decade, coral cover in the Pelican Shoals marine reserve expanded by 28 percent following the introduction of artificial calcium-carbonate reef structures. During the same period, nearby unmanaged reefs without these structures experienced a 12 percent decline in coral cover. Because artificial structures provide optimal substrate for coral larvae settlement and stabilization, the installation of these structures was clearly the primary cause of the coral recovery in Pelican Shoals.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the marine biologist's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Concurrent with the installation of the artificial structures, authorities enforced an exclusive ban on commercial fishing in Pelican Shoals, triggering a surge in parrotfish populations that graze away coral-suppressing macroalgae.

Answer

The statement showing that a concurrent fishing ban caused an increase in algae-eating fish that protect young coral.
The biologist concludes that artificial calcium-carbonate structures were the primary cause of coral recovery based solely on a correlation between their introduction and an increase in coral cover. The correct answer undermines this causal claim by introducing a significant confounding factor: a concurrent commercial fishing moratorium that boosted populations of algae-grazing parrotfish. Because macroalgae compete with and suffocate young corals, the surge in herbivorous fish offers a robust alternative explanation for the coral expansion in Pelican Shoals, casting substantial doubt on the claim that the artificial structures were the primary driver.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the argument
Premises: Coral cover in Pelican Shoals increased by 28% after artificial structures were introduced, while unmanaged reefs declined by 12%. Artificial structures offer good substrate for larvae. Conclusion: The installation of artificial structures was the primary cause of coral recovery in Pelican Shoals.
Deconstructing the argument into premises and conclusion is essential for identifying the logical gap.
2
Identify the logical flaw and underlying causal assumption
The author commits a correlation-to-causation fallacy by assuming that because the coral recovery followed the deployment of artificial structures and did not happen in unmanaged reefs, no other confounding variables or simultaneous initiatives were responsible for the improvement.
Weaken questions targeting causal claims are most effectively undermined by providing an alternative cause or showing a confounding variable.
3
Evaluate the answer choices for an effective weakener
The statement detailing the concurrent fishing ban and subsequent surge in herbivorous parrotfish provides an independent, highly plausible alternative explanation for the coral rebound, directly undermining the claim that the physical structures were the primary cause.
Demonstrating that another major causal factor occurred simultaneously in the managed reserve breaks the exclusive attribution to the artificial structures.

Key Concept

Causal Reasoning and Alternative Explanations
Estimated Time:1m 45s
Question 1672Question →

Historically, conservationists focused primarily on preserving pristine habitats to protect biodiversity. However, recent ecological strategies have shifted toward active restoration, increasingly utilizing "ecosystem engineers" like the North American beaver. By constructing dams, beavers create expansive wetlands that filter pollutants from waterways and provide crucial habitats for amphibians and waterfowl. Furthermore, the slow-moving water behind beaver dams recharges local groundwater tables, making surrounding areas more resilient to droughts. While some landowners consider beavers a nuisance due to localized flooding and felled trees, the net ecological benefits of their activities far outweigh these inconveniences. Ultimately, integrating beavers into conservation planning offers a highly effective, nature-based approach to revitalizing degraded landscapes.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Integrating beavers into environmental conservation strategies represents a highly effective, nature-based method for restoring degraded ecosystems.

Answer

The correct answer states that integrating beavers into environmental conservation strategies represents a highly effective, nature-based method for restoring degraded ecosystems.
The passage introduces the shift toward active restoration using beavers, details the specific ecological benefits they provide, acknowledges a minor counter-argument, and concludes that their net benefits make them an effective tool for landscape revitalization. The correct option accurately captures this overarching thesis without getting bogged down in the specific mechanisms (like groundwater recharge or pollutant filtration) which serve only as subsidiary evidence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the passage to identify the author's primary goal.
The passage begins with context (historical conservation), introduces a shift (using beavers for active restoration), provides evidence (filtering water, creating habitat, recharging groundwater), addresses a counterpoint (landowner nuisance), and ends with a concluding synthesis.
Understanding the structural flow helps separate the background and supporting evidence from the central thesis.
2
Locate the overarching conclusion of the argument.
The final sentence ('Ultimately, integrating beavers into conservation planning offers a highly effective... approach') serves as the explicit main point that the rest of the passage is designed to support.
In many argumentative passages, the main point is synthesized at the end after all evidence and counter-arguments have been presented.
3
Evaluate the options against the identified main point, being careful to reject mere supporting facts.
Two options describe the specific benefits of dams (filtering water, recharging groundwater). These are rejected as subsidiary points. One option is overly broad, and another distorts the text. The correct option accurately paraphrases the final sentence.
Distinguishing between a true statement from the passage and the actual main point of the passage is the core skill required for this question.

Key Concept

Distinguishing Main Point from Subsidiary Points
Question 1673Question →

No urban redevelopment plan succeeds unless it secures the endorsement of the neighborhood council. Furthermore, the neighborhood council will not endorse any plan that involves the seizure of private property. It follows that an urban redevelopment plan will fail if it involves the seizure of private property.

Which of the following arguments exhibits a logical structure most similar to that of the argument above?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: An employee cannot be promoted to senior management unless they demonstrate exceptional leadership skills. But employees who avoid taking on high-risk projects do not demonstrate exceptional leadership skills. Consequently, an employee who avoids taking on high-risk projects will not be promoted to senior management.

Answer

The argument concerning employee promotion and high-risk projects exhibits the identical logical structure.
The correct answer accurately duplicates the valid deductive architecture of the stimulus. The stimulus establishes that an outcome (success) requires a condition (endorsement), but a specific feature (seizure) prevents that condition, meaning the feature guarantees the outcome will not happen (failure). The correct option identically establishes that an outcome (promotion) requires a condition (leadership), but a specific feature (avoiding risk) prevents that condition, meaning the feature guarantees the outcome will not happen (no promotion).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Map the logical structure of the stimulus argument.
Premise 1: Succeeds -> Endorsement. Premise 2: Seizure -> NOT Endorsement. Conclusion: Seizure -> NOT Succeeds.
Identifying the formal abstract structure is necessary to find a structural parallel without being distracted by subject matter.
2
Identify the logical validity and archetype of the stimulus.
The argument is valid. It uses a chain combining a necessary condition with Modus Tollens: A -> B; C -> ~B; therefore C -> ~A.
Recognizing that the stimulus is valid means the correct answer must also be a perfectly valid deduction.
3
Evaluate the structure of the options against the mapped stimulus.
The correct option maps as: Promoted -> Leadership; Avoid Risk -> NOT Leadership; Conclusion: Avoid Risk -> NOT Promoted. This is an exact A -> B; C -> ~B; therefore C -> ~A match.
Comparing abstract structures ensures a perfect match in logical architecture and modal certainty.

Key Concept

Parallel Valid Structure
Question 1674Question →

Agricultural Economist: In our region, the new drought-resistant wheat variety produces the exact same yield per acre as traditional varieties. However, in the three years since all regional farmers switched to this new variety, their average net income has decreased. Since the yields have remained consistent, cultivating the new drought-resistant wheat variety must involve higher production costs per acre than cultivating traditional varieties.

The statement 'The market price for wheat has not decreased significantly over the past three years' functions as a necessary assumption of the economist's argument.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
The statement correctly identifies a necessary assumption. By stating that higher costs 'must' be the reason for the decreased net income, the economist assumes that other variables determining net income—specifically, the market price of the wheat—have not caused the decline. Negating the statement provides an alternative explanation that completely undermines the conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the argument's core structure (premises and conclusion).
Conclusion: Cultivating the new wheat variety must involve higher production costs. Premises: Yield per acre is the exact same, but average net income has decreased.
Isolating the conclusion and premises makes it easier to spot the logical leap or missing link.
2
Analyze the conceptual relationship between the components of the argument.
Net income is a function of revenue (yield × price) minus costs. The economist observes a drop in income and constant yield, then jumps straight to blaming higher costs.
Exposing the mathematical or logical relationship reveals unstated factors, such as market price, that also affect the outcome.
3
Apply the Negation Technique to the provided statement to test for necessity.
Negated statement: 'The market price for wheat HAS decreased significantly.' If true, the decreased price alone explains the lower income. The conclusion that costs 'must' be higher falls apart.
The Negation Technique is the definitive test for a necessary assumption. If negating the statement destroys the argument, the statement is an absolute requirement.

Key Concept

Identifying Defender Assumptions (Ruling out alternative explanations)
Question 1675Question →

A moral theory is considered practically useful only if it provides clear guidelines for daily action. Providing clear guidelines for daily action requires the theory to be based on universally recognizable human experiences. Therefore, any moral theory that is based on universally recognizable human experiences must be considered practically useful.

Which one of the following arguments exhibits a flawed pattern of reasoning most parallel to that exhibited in the argument above?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A software system is deemed secure only if it undergoes rigorous penetration testing. Undergoing rigorous penetration testing requires a dedicated budget for independent auditors. Hence, any software system with a dedicated budget for independent auditors must be deemed secure.

Answer

The argument concluding that any software system with a dedicated budget must be deemed secure.
The correct answer exactly mimics the flawed structure of the stimulus. The stimulus establishes a transitive chain: A is sufficient for B, and B is sufficient for C (A -> B -> C). It then erroneously concludes that C is sufficient for A (C -> A). The correct choice establishes that Secure (S) requires Testing (T), and Testing (T) requires Budget (B). This creates the chain S -> T -> B. It then erroneously concludes that having a Budget (B) is sufficient to be Secure (S). This is a perfect match for the Illegal Reversal of the full chain.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the logical structure of the stimulus premises.
Premise 1: Practically Useful (PU) -> Clear Guidelines (CG). Premise 2: Clear Guidelines (CG) -> Universally Recognizable (UR).
Translating indicator words ('only if', 'requires') into formal sufficient-necessary conditions is the first step in parallel conditional reasoning.
2
Analyze the logical structure of the stimulus conclusion and identify the flaw.
Conclusion: Universally Recognizable (UR) -> Practically Useful (PU). Flaw: Illegal Reversal of the transitive chain.
The stimulus chains A -> B and B -> C to form A -> C, but the conclusion illegally reverses this to C -> A.
3
Evaluate the options to find an identical flawed structure (A -> B, B -> C, therefore C -> A).
The correct option correctly translates to: Secure (S) -> Testing (T), Testing (T) -> Budget (B), Therefore Budget (B) -> Secure (S).
Parallel reasoning questions require matching the exact premises, conclusion sequence, and logical flaw present in the stimulus.

Key Concept

Parallel Flaw - Illegal Reversal of a Transitive Chain
Question 1676Question →

Analyze the stimulus argument and the candidate argument provided below.

Stimulus: If the museum secures additional funding, it will open a new exhibit. The museum will attract more tourists only if it opens a new exhibit. Therefore, if the museum secures additional funding, it will attract more tourists.

Candidate Argument: If the author publishes a new novel, she will go on a book tour. The author will go on a book tour only if she receives a literary award. Thus, if the author publishes a new novel, she will receive a literary award.

Evaluate the following statement: The candidate argument exhibits a pattern of conditional reasoning that is structurally parallel to the stimulus argument.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False
The statement is false because the two arguments do not share the same logical structure. The stimulus argument is flawed, incorrectly concluding a conditional relationship between two sufficient conditions. In contrast, the candidate argument is a valid transitive deduction.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the formal logical structure of the stimulus argument.
Premise 1: Funding → Exhibit. Premise 2: Tourists → Exhibit ('only if' introduces the necessary condition). Conclusion: Funding → Tourists.
To determine the pattern of reasoning, we must translate the statements into formal conditional logic.
2
Evaluate the validity of the stimulus argument.
The argument is flawed. It presents two sufficient conditions (Funding, Tourists) for the same necessary condition (Exhibit) but incorrectly concludes that one sufficient condition leads to the other.
Parallel reasoning requires matching both the structural skeleton and the validity of the argument.
3
Analyze the logical structure and validity of the candidate argument.
Premise 1: Novel → Tour. Premise 2: Tour → Award. Conclusion: Novel → Award. This is a valid transitive deduction.
We must map the candidate's structure to compare it against the stimulus.
4
Compare the two logical structures to determine if they are parallel.
The stimulus is a flawed argument (A → B, C → B, therefore A → C), while the candidate is a valid transitive chain (A → B, B → C, therefore A → C).
Because their logical structures and validities differ fundamentally, they are not parallel.

Key Concept

Parallel Conditional Logic
Question 1677Question →

[1] The recent resurgence of interest in "degrowth" economics—a movement advocating for the intentional reduction of global production and consumption—has sparked vigorous debate among ecological economists. [2] Advocates of degrowth contend that infinite economic expansion is biophysically impossible on a finite planet, and that curbing gross domestic product is the only reliable method to avert ecological collapse. [3] Critics, however, maintain that technological innovation and the decoupling of resource use from economic growth can allow for sustainable expansion without sacrificing living standards. [4] While both sides present compelling ecological data, the degrowth movement's proposed solutions ultimately fail because they severely underestimate the political and social instability that would inevitably result from a deliberately induced global economic contraction. [5] Implementing degrowth policies would require a massive redistribution of wealth and an unprecedented level of international cooperation, neither of which is politically feasible in the current geopolitical climate. [6] Furthermore, a forced reduction in economic output would disproportionately harm developing nations, which rely on sustained growth to lift their populations out of poverty and build essential infrastructure.

Which sentence (provide the number from 1 to 6) contains the explicit main point of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 4; Sentence 4; Four; sentence 4; four

Answer

Sentence 4
Sentence 4 is the correct answer because it explicitly states the author's central argument: that despite compelling ecological data, degrowth solutions fail due to their severe underestimation of resulting political and social instability. The preceding sentences set up a debate, while the subsequent sentences provide supporting evidence for this specific claim.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the structural function of the opening sentences.
Sentences 1 through 3 introduce a debate, presenting the viewpoints of degrowth advocates and their critics without expressing the author's own stance.
Differentiating attributed viewpoints from the author's own voice is essential for locating the main point.
2
Locate the sentence where the author asserts their own overarching conclusion.
In Sentence 4, the author transitions from summarizing others to stating their own thesis: that the degrowth movement's solutions 'ultimately fail' due to the underestimation of political and social instability.
The explicit main point must be the central claim that the author seeks to prove.
3
Verify that the remaining sentences act as supporting premises for this claim.
Sentences 5 and 6 provide specific examples of the instability and impracticality mentioned in Sentence 4 (political unfeasibility and harm to developing nations).
A true main point is supported by the evidence and subsidiary points in the rest of the passage.

Key Concept

Explicit Main Point Identification
Question 1678Question →

Read the following passage regarding linguistic theories of Creole language formation. Based strictly on the explicitly stated arguments in the text, match each theoretical perspective to its central thesis.

The genesis of Creole languages has long provoked intense debate among linguists, yielding several competing models of language formation. Proponents of the substratist hypothesis maintain that the grammatical architectures of Creoles are fundamentally derived from the indigenous or native languages—the substrate—of the colonized populations, even as the lexicon is largely drawn from European colonizers. In this view, grammatical transfer from the substrate remains the primary engine of Creole genesis.

Conversely, superstratists emphasize the primacy of the European lexifier languages. They argue that Creoles represent a natural, albeit accelerated, evolution of the colonizers' languages, which were simplified through a process of 'foreigner talk' or imperfect second-language acquisition by the colonized peoples. For superstratists, the structural deviations from standard European tongues are merely the result of systematic linguistic reduction rather than substrate interference.

A third paradigm, the language bioprogram hypothesis posited by universalists, rejects both historical sources as primary. Universalists assert that because Creole languages emerged rapidly with striking structural similarities across disparate geographic regions, they must reflect an innate, biological blueprint for language acquisition inherent in the human species. This cognitive schema, they argue, is activated when children are exposed to the impoverished, unstructured linguistic input of a preliminary pidgin.

While each of these historical paradigms offers valuable insights into isolated grammatical features, they universally suffer from a reductionist impulse that fails to account for the immense structural diversity among Creoles. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of Creole genesis necessitates an ecological approach: one which posits that Creole languages are not the product of any singular linguistic mechanism—be it substrate transfer, superstrate simplification, or biological inevitability—but rather the dynamic, emergent result of specific socioeconomic and demographic pressures interacting in unique, localized contact settings.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Substratist hypothesis
Superstratist hypothesis
Universalist hypothesis
The author's ecological approach

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Substratist hypothesis matches with indigenous structure retention; Superstratist hypothesis matches with systematic reduction of the dominant tongue; Universalist hypothesis matches with inherent cognitive schema; The author's ecological approach matches with the interplay of localized socio-demographic variables.
The passage explicitly defines four distinct theoretical perspectives on Creole genesis. The substratist hypothesis is defined by its focus on grammatical transfer from native languages, perfectly matching the retention of indigenous linguistic structures. The superstratist hypothesis emphasizes the reduction of the colonizers' language, corresponding to the systematic reduction of the dominant group's tongue. The universalist hypothesis introduces a biological blueprint triggered by impoverished input, which aligns with an inherent cognitive schema. Finally, the author explicitly states their own thesis in the concluding paragraph: that Creole formation requires an ecological approach driven by localized socio-demographic variables. By aligning each perspective's textual definition with the corresponding paraphrased thesis statement, all four pairs are accurately established.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage to locate the explicitly stated thesis of the substratist hypothesis.
The text states that substratists believe Creole grammar is derived from indigenous native languages.
Accurately identifying each viewpoint's explicit claim is required to establish the correct matches.
2
Analyze the passage to locate the explicitly stated thesis of the superstratist hypothesis.
The text states that superstratists believe Creoles evolved through the simplification and imperfect acquisition of European lexifier languages.
This isolates the core argument necessary for the second match.
3
Analyze the passage to locate the explicitly stated thesis of the universalist hypothesis.
The text states that universalists argue for an innate biological blueprint triggered by unstructured linguistic input.
This isolates the core argument necessary for the third match.
4
Analyze the passage's concluding paragraph to locate the author's explicitly stated main point.
The author argues that Creole genesis requires an ecological approach, relying on dynamic socioeconomic and demographic pressures.
This completes the identification process, allowing the final pair to be correctly matched.

Key Concept

Identifying explicitly stated main points and accurately attributing distinct viewpoints to their respective proponents within a densely structured passage.
Question 1679Question →

Passage:
Jürgen Habermas’s influential formulation of the 'public sphere' posits the seventeenth-century English coffeehouse as the crucible of democratic discourse—a space where rational-critical debate superseded social hierarchy. According to this model, the coffeehouse's egalitarian ethos stripped patrons of their aristocratic or plebeian status, uniting them in the disinterested pursuit of truth. However, recent historiography exposes the limitations of this idealized vision. By examining contemporary licensing records and spatial geographies of London, historians have demonstrated that coffeehouses were highly segregated by profession and political affiliation. Lloyd’s coffeehouse, for example, catered exclusively to maritime insurers, effectively functioning as an extension of the Royal Exchange rather than a forum for universal debate. Consequently, it becomes clear that the Habermasian narrative fundamentally mischaracterizes the early modern coffeehouse. Far from serving as an incubator for an inclusive democratic public sphere, the coffeehouse primarily functioned as an instrument of mercantile consolidation, allowing nascent capitalist elites to forge exclusive networks while projecting an illusion of egalitarian access.

Analyze the logical structure of the author's argument. Order the following claims extracted from the text according to their hierarchical role in the argument, beginning with the contextual premise (the established view being challenged), proceeding upward through the chain of evidentiary support (from the most specific factual premise to a broader generalization), and culminating in the author's ultimate main thesis.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct logical progression is: 1. Contextual premise (Habermasian view), 2. Specific factual premise (Lloyd's), 3. Broader generalization (Segregation by profession), 4. Subsidiary conclusion (Habermasian view is inaccurate), 5. Ultimate main thesis (Instrument of mercantile consolidation).
The argument begins by establishing the Habermasian consensus as a baseline (Contextual Premise). It then introduces specific historical data regarding Lloyd's (Specific Evidence) to prove a broader historical reality of segregation (Broad Generalization). This generalization logically forces the rejection of the Habermasian model (Subsidiary Conclusion). Finally, having dismantled the old view, the author synthesizes the evidence into their primary positive claim: that coffeehouses were actually tools for mercantile consolidation (Main Thesis).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the author's main thesis and subsidiary conclusions.
The main thesis is that coffeehouses were instruments of mercantile consolidation. The subsidiary conclusion is that the Habermasian view of universal accessibility is inaccurate.
Understanding the ultimate goal of the passage separates the final conclusion from the intermediate steps used to get there.
2
Identify the contextual premise being evaluated.
The claim about the coffeehouse's egalitarian ethos uniting patrons is the Habermasian model, which the author introduces specifically to dismantle.
The passage begins by framing the scholarly consensus before introducing evidence to refute it.
3
Distinguish between specific evidence and broad generalizations.
The claim about Lloyd's is specific evidence that supports the broader claim that London coffeehouses were strictly segregated by profession.
In logical arguments, specific instances (Lloyd's) are used to prove broader inductive generalizations (overall segregation), which in turn support conclusions.
4
Sequence the items logically from foundational context to the ultimate conclusion.
Contextual Premise -> Specific Evidence -> Broad Evidence -> Subsidiary Conclusion -> Main Thesis.
This order strictly follows the 'hierarchy of support' requested in the stem, reconstructing the author's complete argumentative framework.

Key Concept

Distinguishing Main Point from Subsidiary Points and Mapping Argument Structure
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Question 1680Question →

Traditional art historical narratives frequently posit that the invention of photography in the mid-nineteenth century liberated painting from its representational duties. According to this view, because the camera could perfectly capture objective reality, painters were suddenly free to explore subjective emotion and formal abstraction, culminating in movements like Impressionism. However, this triumphalist narrative obscures the profound epistemological crisis that photography actually provoked within the painting establishment. Rather than joyfully abandoning representation, painters found themselves forced into a defensive posture, compelled to actively justify the continued relevance of their medium in an era of mechanical reproduction. To achieve this, many academic painters did not retreat into abstraction; instead, they doubled down on the unique material qualities of paint—its texture, its capacity for rendering vibrant, non-naturalistic color, and its ability to convey the physical trace of the artist's hand—qualities that the monochromatic, long-exposure photographs of the era could not replicate. Thus, the shift in late nineteenth-century painting was less a spontaneous embrace of newfound freedom than a calculated, defensive redefinition of what constituted artistic truth, formulated in direct reaction to the existential threat posed by the camera.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The transformation of late nineteenth-century painting was not a spontaneous liberation from realism, but rather a defensive redefinition of the medium's value in response to the threat of photography.

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that the transformation of painting was a defensive redefinition in response to photography, rather than a spontaneous liberation.
The correct answer perfectly synthesizes the author's core argument: it acknowledges the rejection of the 'triumphalist narrative' (that painting was spontaneously liberated) and captures the author's alternative thesis (that painting engaged in a defensive redefinition to survive the threat of photography). This matches the concluding sentence, which serves as the passage's ultimate thesis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage structure to isolate the author's primary conclusion.
The author introduces a 'traditional narrative' (painting was liberated by photography), rejects it ('However, this triumphalist narrative obscures...'), provides counter-evidence (painters emphasized material qualities), and concludes with a synthesis ('Thus, the shift... was less a spontaneous embrace... than a calculated, defensive redefinition').
Identifying the structural role of each paragraph/sentence separates context and evidence from the main thesis.
2
Evaluate the options against the identified main thesis.
The correct option must encompass both the rejection of the old narrative and the establishment of the new one (defensive redefinition).
A main point must reflect the comprehensive scope of the author's argument, not just a portion of it.
3
Eliminate options that are factually true but function only as supporting evidence or context.
Options detailing the specific material properties of paint or outlining the traditional historian's view are eliminated as subsidiary points.
Subsidiary points support the main conclusion but do not stand as the central purpose of the passage as a whole.

Key Concept

Distinguishing Main Point from Subsidiary Points
PreviousPage 84 / 198Next
All practice questions — LSAT | Examkin