A 35-year-old client with end-stage renal disease is admitted to the medical-surgical unit. The client is alert, oriented, and calmly informs the nurse of the decision to discontinue all future hemodialysis treatments. The client articulates a clear understanding that this decision will lead to death. The client's adult sibling becomes extremely upset and demands that the nurse administer a sedative to the client so that dialysis can be forcibly initiated. Which action by the nurse represents the most appropriate ethical practice?
- Support the client's right to refuse medical treatment and notify the healthcare provider to discuss palliative care options.Answer
- BAdminister a prescribed PRN sedative to the client to safely facilitate the life-saving hemodialysis procedure.
- CTell the client that discontinuing dialysis is a permanent decision and question why they want to give up so easily.
- DInstruct the unlicensed assistive personnel (UAP) to sit with the client and explain the physical consequences of refusing dialysis.
Answer
Support the client's right to refuse medical treatment and notify the healthcare provider to discuss palliative care options.
The correct action demonstrates adherence to the ethical principle of autonomy. When a client is alert, oriented, and possesses decision-making capacity, they have the fundamental right to refuse any medical treatment, including life-sustaining measures like hemodialysis. The nurse's role as an advocate is to respect this decision, protect the client from coercion (such as the sibling's demands), and ensure the healthcare provider is informed so that appropriate comfort and palliative care measures can be initiated.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Client Autonomy and Informed Refusal