Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardCommand of Evidence: Textual

In a study of agricultural resilience in medieval Europe, historian Dr. Marcus Vance examined how different governance models within farming collectives affected their survival during periods of extreme weather. Vance focused on two structures: centralized collectives, where a single governing board directed planting schedules, and decentralized collectives, where decisions were made through consensus among individual families. Vance argues that decentralized collectives were more resilient to localized crop failures because they were better structured to integrate and act upon micro-climatic observations—such as subtle variations in soil moisture and wind patterns—gathered by individual farmers.

Which choice, if true, would most directly support Vance's argument?

  1. A
    Decentralized collectives generally required more time to reach consensus on long-term infrastructure projects, such as building irrigation canals, than centralized collectives did.
  2. During a period of severe drought, decentralized collectives that allowed families to alter their crop choices based on daily localized soil conditions achieved higher survival rates than centralized collectives that maintained uniform planting directives.Answer
  3. C
    Individual families in decentralized collectives possessed a greater innate interest in environmental patterns, which naturally led them to seek out farming practices that minimized ecological damage.
  4. D
    Centralized collectives that successfully integrated consensus-based decision-making into their governing boards showed a marked increase in crop yields compared to decentralized collectives.

Answer

The choice stating that during a period of severe drought, decentralized collectives that allowed families to alter their crop choices based on daily localized soil conditions achieved higher survival rates than centralized collectives that maintained uniform planting directives.
The correct answer provides direct support for the claim by showing a real-world scenario where decentralized collectives—which allowed families to act on daily localized soil observations—outperformed centralized collectives that enforced uniform schedules. This directly connects the integration of micro-climatic data to superior agricultural resilience under extreme weather conditions (a severe drought).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary claim made by Dr. Marcus Vance in the passage.
The claim is that decentralized collectives were more resilient to localized crop failures because they were better structured to integrate and act upon micro-climatic observations gathered by individual farmers.
To evaluate the options, we must first clearly understand the specific argument that needs support.
2
Analyze each option to see if it provides empirical evidence connecting decentralized governance, individual micro-climatic observations, and increased resilience.
Only the option mentioning decentralized collectives adapting crop choices based on localized soil conditions during a drought and achieving higher survival rates aligns with all elements of the claim.
Supporting evidence must directly link the cause (decentralized structure acting on local observations) and the effect (increased resilience/survival during extreme weather).

Key Concept

Command of Evidence: Textual
Rate this question

Topics

Command of Evidence: Textual

More questions from this topic