Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumOverall Text Structure Analysis

To explain the evolutionary origin of angiosperms (flowering plants), early paleobotanists proposed the upland origin hypothesis, which argued that angiosperms first evolved in dry, mountainous regions where fossil preservation was poor. This hypothesis accounted for the sudden appearance of diverse floral fossils in the lowlands during the Cretaceous period. However, recent cladistic analyses and microfossil discoveries have challenged this view, suggesting instead that angiosperms originated in wet, disturbed lowland environments. Proponents of this modern view argue that early angiosperms were herbaceous weeds that adapted rapidly to floodplains, meaning the sudden fossil abundance reflects ecological expansion rather than a migration from upland refugia.

Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?

  1. A
    It outlines a historical debate between two paleobotanists, details the methods used by each to collect fossil evidence, and concludes by arguing that both theories are partially correct.
  2. It presents a traditional scientific hypothesis, explains the phenomenon it was designed to address, introduces a rival explanation supported by newer findings, and details how this rival explanation reinterprets the phenomenon.Answer
  3. C
    It describes a biological phenomenon, proposes a methodology to study that phenomenon under difficult field conditions, and advocates for the widespread adoption of that methodology.
  4. D
    It introduces a consensus view on plant evolution, details the geological timeline of the Cretaceous period, and highlights the geographical locations where the oldest plant fossils were discovered.

Answer

The overall structure of the text is best described as presenting a traditional scientific hypothesis, explaining the phenomenon it was designed to address, introducing a rival explanation supported by newer findings, and detailing how this rival explanation reinterprets the phenomenon.
The correct answer accurately outlines the structure of the passage. The text first introduces the traditional 'upland origin' hypothesis and explains how it accounted for the sudden emergence of lowland fossils. It then introduces a newer, rival explanation (lowland origin) supported by recent analyses and microfossil evidence, and concludes by detailing how this rival explanation reinterprets the fossil evidence as ecological expansion rather than upland migration.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the initial rhetorical move in the passage.
The passage begins by presenting a traditional view (the upland origin hypothesis) and explains how this hypothesis accounted for the sudden emergence of lowland fossils in the Cretaceous period.
This establishes the historical context and the primary phenomenon that the traditional theory aimed to explain.
2
Identify the transition and the introduction of new evidence.
The word 'However' signals a shift to recent cladistic analyses and microfossil discoveries that challenge the upland origin hypothesis, introducing the modern lowland origin hypothesis instead.
This shows how new research methods and evidence led to a competing scientific theory.
3
Analyze how the passage concludes.
The text ends by explaining how proponents of the lowland origin hypothesis account for the fossil abundance (interpreting it as ecological expansion of herbaceous weeds rather than upland migration).
This demonstrates how the new theory offers an alternative interpretation of the same geological evidence.

Key Concept

Overall Text Structure Analysis
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Rate this question

Topics

Overall Text Structure Analysis

More questions from this topic