Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumLogical Inferences

In cognitive psychology, Attention Restoration Theory (ART) posits that natural environments restore directed attention capacity by engaging involuntary 'soft fascination,' whereas urban environments exhaust voluntary attention. In a recent study, researchers had two groups of participants perform a cognitively taxing memory task, after which Group A walked through a nature reserve and Group B walked along a busy city street. Upon returning, both groups repeated the memory task. Group A showed a significant increase in recall accuracy, while Group B’s performance remained unchanged. However, when the researchers repeated the experiment but had Group A listen to loud traffic noise via headphones during their nature walk, Group A’s post-walk performance increase was completely eliminated. Which choice most logically completes the text?

  1. auditory stimulation from urban environments can disrupt the cognitive restoration typically provided by exposure to natural settings.Answer
  2. B
    walking in a nature reserve provides no cognitive benefits if a person is not actively focusing on the visual details of the environment.
  3. C
    urban environments would be just as restorative as natural environments if noise levels in cities were significantly reduced.
  4. D
    auditory sensory inputs are more cognitively demanding for the human brain to process than visual sensory inputs are.

Answer

auditory stimulation from urban environments can disrupt the cognitive restoration typically provided by exposure to natural settings.
The correct option is directly supported by the experimental results: Group A participants showed cognitive improvement after a walk in nature, but this improvement was completely blocked when they were exposed to urban traffic noise via headphones during the walk. This demonstrates that urban auditory stimuli can interfere with the restorative effects of natural environments.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the baseline experimental findings.
A nature walk restored attention capacity (increased task accuracy for Group A), whereas an urban walk did not (unchanged performance for Group B).
This establishes the default effect of each environment on cognitive recovery.
2
Analyze the impact of the auditory variable on the nature walk group.
Adding urban traffic noise during the nature walk eliminated the cognitive improvement previously observed in Group A.
This highlights the specific role that noise plays in blocking attention restoration.
3
Synthesize the findings to form a logical conclusion.
The presence of urban noise is sufficient to prevent the cognitive restoration that a natural environment would otherwise provide.
This yields the only inference directly supported by the combination of premises.

Key Concept

Logical Inferences
Rate this question

Topics

Logical Inferences

More questions from this topic