In a study of early twentieth-century modernist literature, literary scholar Dr. Anaya Sen analyzed the impact of European-based expatriate journals, such as *The Exile*, on the careers of emerging American writers. Sen hypothesized that publication in these small-circulation journals did not merely provide artistic validation; rather, it served as a critical intermediary that directly facilitated these writers' subsequent acceptance by major, high-circulation publishing houses in the United States. Which finding from Sen's study, if true, would most directly support her hypothesis?
- AEuropean-based expatriate journals like *The Exile* featured works by established European authors alongside those of emerging American writers to attract a broader international audience.
- BEmerging American writers frequently expressed in their personal correspondence a strong preference for the aesthetic style of European journals over that of US publications.
- Writers who published in *The Exile* were subsequently accepted by major US publishing houses at a significantly higher rate than writers of similar initial standing who did not publish in expatriate journals.Answer
- DMainstream US publishing houses during the early twentieth century underwent a major shift toward publishing works that challenged traditional literary conventions.
Answer
The finding that writers who published in *The Exile* were subsequently accepted by major US publishing houses at a significantly higher rate than writers of similar initial standing who did not publish in expatriate journals.
The correct answer directly supports the hypothesis by showing a clear, measurable difference in acceptance rates by major US publishing houses between writers who published in *The Exile* and those who did not, thereby confirming the journal's role as a facilitating intermediary.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Identifying textual evidence that supports a specific hypothesis