Question

Difficulty: MediumLogical Inferences

Many marine phytoplankton species rely on dissolved iron to synthesize chlorophyll for photosynthesis. In the Southern Ocean, low iron concentrations typically limit phytoplankton growth. However, researchers observed rapid increases in phytoplankton blooms during periods of high continental dust deposition. Some scientists hypothesized that the dust directly supplies iron to the water, while others proposed that the dust stimulates local iron-producing bacteria. Analyses of the dust revealed that it releases highly bioavailable iron upon contacting seawater, whereas local bacterial populations showed no change in density or activity during the blooms.

Which choice most logically completes the text?

  1. The increase in phytoplankton blooms is primarily driven by the iron directly released from the dust rather than by the activity of local bacteria.Answer
  2. B
    Continental dust deposition is the sole source of dissolved iron in the Southern Ocean throughout the entire year.
  3. C
    Local bacterial populations in the Southern Ocean do not require dissolved iron to survive.
  4. D
    The phytoplankton blooms would grow even larger if the density of local iron-producing bacteria were artificially reduced.

Answer

The increase in phytoplankton blooms is primarily driven by the iron directly released from the dust rather than by the activity of local bacteria.
The correct answer logically completes the text because the passage sets up two possible explanations for why dust deposition increases phytoplankton blooms: direct supply of iron by the dust, or stimulation of iron-producing bacteria. Since the dust was shown to release iron directly and the bacteria showed no changes in activity or density, the evidence supports the direct-supply hypothesis and refutes the bacterial-stimulation hypothesis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the two competing hypotheses presented in the passage.
The first hypothesis states that dust directly supplies iron to the Southern Ocean. The second hypothesis states that dust stimulates local bacteria to produce iron.
This establishes the framework of the arguments that need to be evaluated.
2
Analyze the experimental findings and evidence provided.
The dust releases bioavailable iron when it contacts seawater, but the local bacterial populations showed no change in density or activity.
This evidence allows us to determine which hypothesis is supported and which is undermined.
3
Select the option that logically follows from the evidence.
Since the dust directly releases iron and the bacteria are unaffected, the bloom must be driven directly by the iron from the dust, not by the bacteria.
This completes the logical chain and yields the correct inference.

Key Concept

Drawing logical conclusions that are directly supported by premises in the text and evaluating competing hypotheses based on evidence.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question