An independent accounting contractor working on a confidential audit for a publicly traded company discovers undisclosed financial distress and tells a friend during dinner. The friend subsequently purchases put options on the company's stock before the public earnings release. Which of the following statements regarding regulatory liability under insider trading rules are CORRECT?
- The independent accounting contractor can be held liable as a tipper for breaching a duty of trust and confidentiality by passing material nonpublic information.Answer
- The friend can be held liable as a tippee because trading was conducted while knowingly in possession of material nonpublic information obtained from an insider source.Answer
- CThe friend is exempt from tippee liability because an independent accounting contractor is an external service provider rather than a direct corporate officer of the company.
- DInsider trading regulations apply only when equity shares are directly purchased or sold, excluding derivatives such as put or call options.
Answer
Under federal insider trading rules, both the contractor who passed the information (tipper) and the friend who traded on it (tippee) are liable. External contractors are considered temporary insiders, and insider trading rules cover option transactions as well as direct stock trades.
The correct statements establish that tippers are liable for communicating material nonpublic information in breach of confidentiality and tippees are liable for trading on such information. Contractors act as temporary insiders, and insider trading prohibitions apply broadly to all securities transactions, including options.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Tipper and Tippee Liability for Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information