Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardInsider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information

A Vice President of Clinical Development at a biotechnology firm tells her neighbor, a high school chemistry teacher, during a private dinner that the firm's phase III clinical trial for an oncology drug unexpectedly met all primary endpoints and will receive fast-track approval news next week. The executive cautions the neighbor not to tell anyone, but the neighbor immediately purchases call options on the firm's stock, generating substantial profits when the public announcement occurs. Under federal securities laws governing insider trading, which of the following statements correctly describes the legal status of both individuals?

  1. Both the executive and the neighbor can be held liable for insider trading because passing material nonpublic information breaches a duty of trust, and trading on such information creates tippee liability.Answer
  2. B
    Only the executive can be held liable for insider trading because the neighbor is not an employee, director, or designated insider of the biotechnology firm.
  3. C
    Neither party is liable for insider trading because the executive explicitly warned the neighbor to keep the information confidential and did not execute any personal trades.
  4. D
    The neighbor is exempt from insider trading violations because receiving information as a personal favor without paying financial consideration eliminates tippee liability.

Answer

Both the executive and the neighbor can be held liable for insider trading because passing material nonpublic information breaches a duty of trust, and trading on such information creates tippee liability.
Under the Insider Trading Sanctions Act and SEC Rule 10b-5, insider trading liability extends to both the source of the information (the tipper) and the recipient who trades on it (the tippee). The executive breached her duty of confidentiality by disclosing material nonpublic information about clinical trials, and the neighbor inherited that liability by executing option contracts while possessing that nonpublic data.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the nature of the disclosed information.
Unannounced Phase III trial success is material nonpublic information because a reasonable investor would consider it significant in making an investment decision.
Determining whether information is both material and nonpublic is the threshold requirement of insider trading analysis.
2
Evaluate the liability of the tipper (the corporate executive).
The executive breached her fiduciary duty of confidentiality to her firm by disclosing clinical results to a neighbor, making her liable as a tipper.
A corporate insider who misuses confidential corporate information by sharing it with unauthorized individuals violates federal securities law.
3
Evaluate the liability of the tippee (the neighbor).
The neighbor knew or should have known the information was confidential and material, yet proceeded to trade securities for profit, establishing tippee liability.
Tippee liability is derivative of the tipper's breach; anyone who trades while knowingly in possession of improperly disclosed material nonpublic information commits insider trading regardless of employment status.

Key Concept

Tipper and Tippee Liability under Insider Trading Regulations
Rate this question

Topics

Insider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information