Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardProhibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices

A registered representative at a FINRA member firm is instructed by an institutional client to execute a series of large buy orders in a thinly traded stock during the final two minutes of the trading day. The client explicitly discloses that the objective is to artificially inflate the stock's closing price to prevent a margin call on their existing collateral. The representative executes the trades as requested. When FINRA initiates an enforcement inquiry, the representative claims that FINRA lacks legal jurisdiction to issue fines or sanctions because it is a private self-regulatory organization rather than a federal government agency. Which of the following statements correctly evaluates the trading activity and the representative's defense?

  1. The trading activity constitutes prohibited marking the close, and the representative's defense is invalid because FINRA possesses SEC-delegated regulatory authority to discipline member firms and associated persons.Answer
  2. B
    The trading activity constitutes illegal wash trading because no change in beneficial ownership occurred, and FINRA maintains independent authority to criminally prosecute regulatory violations.
  3. C
    The trading activity is permissible market execution requested by a customer, and the representative's defense is valid because SROs cannot impose administrative fines on individuals without prior SEC authorization.
  4. D
    The trading activity constitutes an illegal dealer principal markup violation, and FINRA lacks jurisdiction because the order was executed in an agency capacity rather than a principal capacity.

Answer

The trading activity constitutes prohibited marking the close, and the representative's defense is invalid because FINRA possesses SEC-delegated regulatory authority to discipline member firms and associated persons.
Executing transactions near the close of trading to artificially alter a security's closing price is a manipulative scheme known as 'marking the close.' Registered representatives cannot execute manipulative orders even if explicitly requested by a client. Furthermore, FINRA is a Self-Regulatory Organization under SEC oversight with full statutory authority to enforce rules and discipline member firms and associated persons through administrative fines, suspensions, or revocations.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the trading activity conducted by the registered representative.
Entering orders near the market close specifically to manipulate the closing settlement price is defined as 'marking the close', which is a strictly prohibited market manipulation practice under SEC and FINRA rules.
Market manipulation rules prohibit any trading activity intended to create a false or misleading appearance of active trading or to manipulate security prices.
2
Evaluate the legal validity of the customer's instruction as a defense.
Following customer instructions does not exempt a registered representative from compliance with federal securities laws and SRO rules prohibiting fraud and price manipulation.
Associated persons have an affirmative duty to refuse customer orders that violate regulatory standards.
3
Assess FINRA's regulatory status and enforcement jurisdiction.
FINRA is a registered Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO) operating under the authority of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC oversight, giving it statutory jurisdiction to conduct investigations, bring disciplinary proceedings, and impose sanctions (including fines, suspensions, and bars) on member firms and registered representatives.
While FINRA cannot file criminal charges (which is reserved for federal and state prosecutors), its administrative enforcement powers over associated persons are broad and legally binding.

Key Concept

Prohibited Market Manipulation (Marking the Close) and SRO Enforcement Authority
Rate this question

Topics

Prohibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices