Examkin

Question

Difficulty: EasyStatement and Arguments

Read the following statement and the two arguments that follow.

Statement: Should the state government implement biometric attendance tracking for administrative staff in public healthcare institutions?

Argument I: Yes, because verifying physical presence improves staff accountability and helps ensure prompt healthcare delivery to the public.
Argument II: No, because monitoring working hours is an extreme administrative action that unfairly violates the personal liberty of employees.

Which of the arguments is strong?

  1. Only argument I is strongAnswer
  2. B
    Only argument II is strong
  3. C
    Neither argument I nor II is strong
  4. D
    Both arguments I and II are strong

Answer

Only argument I is strong.
The argument advocating for attendance verification is strong because establishing accountability in public administration directly supports timely service delivery in essential facilities like hospitals.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Argument I
Argument I directly connects biometric verification with improved accountability and public service quality in healthcare.
An argument is strong if it is realistic, directly relevant to the statement, and based on sound administrative logic.
2
Analyze Argument II
Argument II relies on an extreme assertion, treating standard institutional attendance monitoring as a violation of personal liberty.
An argument is weak if it uses exaggerated claims or fails to present a realistic policy objection.
3
Conclude strength of arguments
Only Argument I meets the criteria for a strong argument.
Argument I provides a valid public governance rationale, whereas Argument II is logically weak.

Key Concept

Evaluating Strong and Weak Arguments
Estimated Time:45s
Rate this question

Topics

Statement and Arguments

More questions from this topic