Read the passage below carefully:
"The enthusiastic adoption of electric buses in tier-2 urban transit networks is frequently touted by municipal authorities as a panacea for both rising urban air pollution and escalating diesel subsidies. While the environmental benefits of zero tailpipe emissions are indisputable, an uncritical celebration of electrification risks obscuring formidable operational and financial vulnerabilities. Municipal transit authorities in secondary cities often lack the high-voltage grid infrastructure necessary for fast-charging depots, leading to battery degradation and unpredicted fleet downtime during peak operational hours. Furthermore, the capital expenditure required for fleet conversion heavily cannibalizes municipal budgets that would otherwise sustain route expansion, suburban feeder connectivity, and routine maintenance of existing infrastructure. Rather than viewing electrification as an isolated technological solution, municipal planners must adopt a broader fiscal and logistical appraisal���integrating battery leasing frameworks, localized renewable microgrids, and phased fleet replacement—to prevent green transitions from crippling essential urban mobility services."
Which of the following best characterizes the author's tone and attitude toward the current municipal strategy for electric bus fleet adoption?
- Pragmatically critical and analytical, advocating for structured planning alongside risk mitigation.Answer
- BHostile and cynical, rejecting electrification as an entirely flawed administrative policy.
- CUnreservedly celebratory and optimistic, promoting immediate complete conversion of public transit fleets.
- DDetached and purely descriptive, presenting municipal transit operational metrics without evaluation.