Consider the following statements regarding the effect of the dissolution of the Lok Sabha on pending bills in the Parliament of India:
1. A bill passed by both Houses of Parliament but pending the assent of the President does not lapse.
2. A bill pending in the Rajya Sabha that has not been passed by the Lok Sabha lapses upon dissolution.
3. A bill passed by the Lok Sabha but pending in the Rajya Sabha does not lapse if the President has notified an intention to summon a joint sitting prior to the dissolution.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
- A1 and 2 only
- 1 and 3 onlyAnswer
- C2 and 3 only
- D1, 2 and 3
Answer
The correct combination of statements is '1 and 3 only'.
Statements 1 and 3 are constitutionally accurate. Under the Indian Constitution, a bill awaiting presidential assent has passed through both legislative chambers and is unaffected by the dissolution of the lower house. Additionally, Article 108(5) explicitly protects a bill from lapsing if the President announced an intention to hold a joint sitting prior to dissolution. Conversely, statement 2 is incorrect because Article 107(4) explicitly specifies that a bill pending in the Rajya Sabha that has not been passed by the Lok Sabha does not lapse.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Effect of Dissolution of Lok Sabha on Pending Parliamentary Business (Articles 107 & 108)
Estimated Time:1m 30s