Examkin

Union Legislature: Parliament Structure, Lawmaking, and Committees

38 questions

All types38Multiple choice20Matching9Ordering9
Question 1Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the Estimates Committee of the Indian Parliament:
1. It consists of 30 members drawn exclusively from the Lok Sabha.
2. A Minister is eligible to be elected as a member of this committee.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 only

Answer

The statement stating '1 only' is correct.
The Estimates Committee is the largest committee of the Indian Parliament comprising 30 members, all elected exclusively from the Lok Sabha annually. Rajya Sabha has no representation in this committee. To maintain legislative oversight, no minister can be elected as a member of the committee.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding the composition of the Estimates Committee.
The Estimates Committee consists of 30 members, and all 30 members are elected from the Lok Sabha only (Rajya Sabha has no representation). Statement 1 is TRUE.
The committee was constituted to examine estimates included in the budget and suggest economies in public expenditure.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding the eligibility of Ministers to serve on the committee.
A Minister cannot be elected as a member of the committee. If a member, after election to the committee, becomes a Minister, they cease to be a member from the date of such appointment. Statement 2 is FALSE.
This rule ensures legislative independence in scrutinizing executive administration and finances.

Key Concept

Structure and membership criteria of Parliamentary Financial Committees (Estimates Committee)
Question 2Question →

Match the following Parliamentary Committees of the Indian Parliament with their respective functions:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Public Accounts Committee
Estimates Committee
Committee on Public Undertakings
Business Advisory Committee

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Public Accounts Committee matches with examining CAG audit reports; Estimates Committee matches with suggesting administrative economies and alternative policies; Committee on Public Undertakings matches with examining public sector reports and accounts; Business Advisory Committee matches with allocating time for legislative business.
The correct matches reflect the specific roles defined in parliamentary procedure: the Public Accounts Committee examines CAG reports; the Estimates Committee focuses on suggesting alternative policies for efficiency and economy; the Committee on Public Undertakings inspects corporate financial performance of state enterprises; and the Business Advisory Committee determines the time allocated for bills and debates in Parliament.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the function of the Public Accounts Committee.
It scrutinizes the expenditure accounts and audit reports presented by the CAG.
Ensure accountability of executive expenditure post-spending.
2
Identify the mandate of the Estimates Committee.
It reviews budget estimates to recommend efficiency measures and alternative policy approaches.
Acts as a continuous economy committee.
3
Match Committee on Public Undertakings and Business Advisory Committee.
Public Undertakings Committee inspects PSU financial records, while the Business Advisory Committee schedules parliamentary proceedings.
Each committee possesses a defined statutory/procedural jurisdiction in Parliament.

Key Concept

Parliamentary Standing Committees and their primary functions
Question 3Question →

Consider the following statements regarding Financial Bills in the Indian Parliament:

1. A Financial Bill (I) governed under Article 117(1) can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha and requires the prior recommendation of the President.
2. A Financial Bill (II) governed under Article 117(3) can be introduced in either House of Parliament without the recommendation of the President for its introduction, but cannot be passed by either House unless the President recommends its consideration.
3. The Rajya Sabha possesses equal powers with the Lok Sabha to reject or amend both Financial Bill (I) and Financial Bill (II), exactly as in the case of an Ordinary Bill.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1, 2 and 3

Answer

All three statements (1, 2, and 3) are correct.
All three statements are constitutionally accurate. Under Article 117(1), Financial Bill (I) shares two characteristics with a Money Bill: introduction exclusively in the Lok Sabha and mandatory prior recommendation of the President. Under Article 117(3), Financial Bill (II) does not require recommendation for introduction, but cannot be passed by either House unless recommended by the President for consideration. Finally, both Financial Bills (I) and (II) follow ordinary legislative procedure regarding Rajya Sabha's right to amend or reject them.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Financial Bill (I) provisions under Article 117(1)
Financial Bill (I) contains matters of Article 110 plus general legislation. Like a Money Bill, it can only be introduced in Lok Sabha and requires the President's prior recommendation. Thus, Statement 1 is correct.
Verify procedural requirements for introducing Financial Bill (I).
2
Analyze Financial Bill (II) provisions under Article 117(3)
Financial Bill (II) involves expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India but no Article 110 matters. It can be introduced in either House without prior recommendation, but requires presidential recommendation prior to consideration for passage. Thus, Statement 2 is correct.
Verify procedural requirements for Financial Bill (II).
3
Evaluate the legislative powers of Rajya Sabha regarding Financial Bills (I) and (II)
Beyond the introduction stage for Financial Bill (I), both Financial Bills (I) and (II) are treated as Ordinary Bills. Rajya Sabha has full powers to reject or amend them, and joint sittings under Article 108 apply in case of deadlock. Thus, Statement 3 is correct.
Determine House parity and Rajya Sabha powers over non-money financial legislation.

Key Concept

Legislative procedure and constitutional classification of Financial Bills (I & II) under Article 117 vs Money Bills under Article 110
Question 4Question →

Arrange the following procedural stages involved in the enactment of the Budget (Annual Financial Statement) in the Indian Parliament in their correct chronological sequence from the initial stage to final enactment:

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological order of stages in passing the Budget in Indian Parliament is: Presentation of the Budget -> General Discussion -> Scrutiny by Departmental Standing Committees during parliamentary recess -> Voting on Demands for Grants (in Lok Sabha) -> Passing of the Appropriation Bill -> Passing of the Finance Bill.
The statutory and procedural flow of the Indian Parliamentary Budget follows six strict sequential stages. It begins with Presentation of the Budget (Article 112), followed by a broad General Discussion. Parliament then adjourns for recess to let 24 Departmentally Related Standing Committees scrutinize individual ministry demands. Upon reassembling, the Lok Sabha votes on Demands for Grants. Next, the Appropriation Bill (Article 114) is passed to authorize withdrawals from the Consolidated Fund of India. Finally, the Finance Bill is passed to enact tax and revenue proposals.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the inaugural stage of the legislative budget process.
Presentation of the Budget (Annual Financial Statement under Article 112) along with the Finance Minister's speech is the first step.
Parliament cannot discuss financial provisions before they are formally laid.
2
Determine the broad debate stage immediately following presentation.
General Discussion takes place in both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.
It allows members to debate overall fiscal policies before detailed scrutiny.
3
Identify the committee evaluation mechanism introduced in 1993.
Recess for Departmentally Related Standing Committees (DRSCs) to examine ministry-wise Demands for Grants.
Houses adjourn temporarily so 24 standing committees can scrutinize detailed estimates and submit reports.
4
Locate the voting phase for expenditure.
Voting on Demands for Grants occurs exclusively in the Lok Sabha.
Under Article 113(2), Rajya Sabha has no voting power on demands for grants.
5
Identify the legislation authorizing expenditure withdrawal.
Passing of the Appropriation Bill under Article 114.
No money can be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund of India except under appropriation made by law.
6
Identify the final legislation authorizing revenue collection.
Passing of the Finance Bill under Article 110/117.
The Finance Bill legalizes tax proposals, completing the enactment of the Budget.

Key Concept

Stages in Enactment of Budget (Annual Financial Statement) under Indian Constitutional Law and Parliamentary Rules
Question 5Question →

Under Article 312 of the Constitution of India, which body holds the exclusive power to pass a resolution enabling the Parliament to create one or more All-India Services common to both the Union and the States?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Rajya Sabha

Answer

Rajya Sabha is the correct answer because Article 312 of the Constitution uniquely empowers the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) to initiate a resolution for creating new All-India Services.
The Rajya Sabha represents the States in the federal structure. Under Article 312, if the Rajya Sabha declares by resolution supported by not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting that it is necessary or expedient in the national interest, Parliament may by law provide for the creation of one or more All-India Services.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant constitutional provision regarding All-India Services
Article 312 deals with the creation of All-India Services.
The Constitution specifies distinct federal provisions for services common to the Union and States.
2
Determine which house of Parliament holds the exclusive initiating power
Rajya Sabha represents the interests of the States and is granted the special power to pass a resolution by a two-thirds majority authorizing Parliament to legislate on All-India Services.
Creating an All-India Service impacts State administration, making the consent of the State-representing house mandatory.

Key Concept

Exclusive Federal Powers of Rajya Sabha under Article 312
Question 6Question →

With reference to the lawmaking procedure for financial bills in the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements:

1. A Financial Bill (Category I) under Article 117(1) can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha and requires the prior recommendation of the President.
2. A Financial Bill (Category II) under Article 117(3) can be introduced in either House of Parliament without the prior recommendation of the President for its introduction.
3. Unlike a Financial Bill (Category I), a Financial Bill (Category II) cannot be rejected or amended by the Rajya Sabha once passed by the Lok Sabha.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 2 only

Answer

Statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is incorrect.
The correct combination includes the first and second statements only. Under Article 117(1), Category I Financial Bills share two characteristics with Money Bills: they must originate in the Lok Sabha and require the recommendation of the President. Under Article 117(3), Category II Financial Bills can originate in either House without prior presidential recommendation at introduction. Category II bills are ordinary in all legislative aspects, meaning the Rajya Sabha holds full powers of amendment and rejection.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding Financial Bill (Category I) under Article 117(1)
Statement 1 is correct. Article 117(1) specifies that a Financial Bill (I), which contains matters listed in Article 110 along with general legislative provisions, can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha and requires the prior recommendation of the President.
Establishing the constitutional prerequisites for introducing a Category I financial bill.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding Financial Bill (Category II) under Article 117(3)
Statement 2 is correct. A Financial Bill (II) contains provisions involving expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India but no Article 110 matters. It can originate in either House and does not require the President's prior recommendation for introduction (though recommendation is needed before consideration/passing).
Evaluating the introduction procedure for Category II financial bills.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding Rajya Sabha's powers over Financial Bill (Category II)
Statement 3 is incorrect. A Financial Bill (Category II) is governed by the ordinary bill procedure in all respects. The Rajya Sabha possesses equal powers to amend or reject it, and deadlocks can be resolved via a joint sitting under Article 108.
Distinguishing the powers of the Rajya Sabha over money bills versus ordinary/financial bills.

Key Concept

Distinction between Money Bills, Financial Bills (Category I under Article 117(1)), and Financial Bills (Category II under Article 117(3))
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 7Question →

Arrange the following sequential stages involved in the passage of an Ordinary Bill within a House of the Indian Parliament in their correct chronological order:

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct procedural order for an Ordinary Bill within a House of Parliament is: First Reading (Introduction), followed by Second Reading (General Discussion), Committee Stage, Consideration Stage, and finally Third Reading.
The lawmaking process for an Ordinary Bill in a House of the Indian Parliament progresses logically from initial presentation to final approval. It begins with First Reading (Introduction), moves into Second Reading's General Discussion, undergoes detailed scrutiny during the Committee Stage, undergoes clause-by-clause voting in the Consideration Stage, and culminates in the Third Reading where the bill is voted upon as a whole.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the initial step of lawmaking in Parliament
First Reading (Introduction of the Bill in the House) takes place when a member moves for leave to introduce the bill.
No debate occurs at this stage; it formally places the bill before the House.
2
Determine the broad evaluation phase after introduction
Second Reading - Stage of General Discussion occurs next.
The House discusses the general provisions and principles of the bill without clause-by-clause voting.
3
Identify the detailed scrutiny phase
Committee Stage follows the general discussion.
The bill is scrutinized in depth by a committee before being reported back to the House.
4
Determine the clause-level voting phase in the House
Consideration Stage takes place after the committee submits its report.
The House considers each clause and proposed amendment individually.
5
Identify the final voting phase within the House
Third Reading concludes the process in that House.
Members vote on whether the bill as a whole should pass without proposing new amendments.

Key Concept

Legislative Procedure for Ordinary Bills in Indian Parliament
Question 8Question →

Match the following Parliamentary Motions and Devices of the Indian Parliament in List-I with their specific procedural characteristics or legal requirements in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Adjournment Motion
Calling Attention Motion
Privilege Motion
Censure Motion

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct matches pair Adjournment Motion with requiring 50 members' support to discuss an urgent matter while carrying censure, Calling Attention Motion with seeking a Minister's statement on urgent public importance without interrupting business, Privilege Motion with addressing a breach caused by withholding or distorting facts, and Censure Motion with stating specific charges against ministers without mandating immediate cabinet resignation upon passage.
Adjournment Motion involves an emergency interruption requiring 50 members' support and implies censure. Calling Attention Motion is an Indian parliamentary innovation seeking an official ministerial statement. Privilege Motion holds ministers accountable for misleading the House or withholding facts. Censure Motion requires explicit grounds and can target specific ministers or the entire cabinet without automatically collapsing the government.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the procedural threshold and nature of an Adjournment Motion.
It requires the support of at least 50 members for leave to be granted, interrupts standard business, and implies censure of government conduct.
It is an extraordinary motion reserved exclusively for urgent matters of immediate concern in Lok Sabha.
2
Identify the distinct origin and purpose of a Calling Attention Motion.
It is an Indian parliamentary creation introduced in 1954 to elicit an official ministerial statement without suspending regular proceedings.
It allows members to highlight urgent public matters formally within rules of procedure.
3
Determine the legal grounds for moving a Privilege Motion.
It is moved when a Minister gives wrong or distorted information or suppresses facts, breaching parliamentary privilege.
Ensures executive accountability regarding accurate communication to the legislature.
4
Evaluate the conditions and consequences of a Censure Motion.
It must state specific reasons/charges and can target individual ministers or the cabinet as a whole; passing it does not force cabinet resignation, unlike a No-Confidence Motion.
Censure is meant to reprimand specific policies or actions, whereas No-Confidence tests overall majority support.

Key Concept

Parliamentary Devices and Legislative Motions in the Indian Parliament
Question 9Question →

Who among the following presides over a joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament convened under Article 108 of the Constitution of India?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Speaker of the Lok Sabha

Answer

The Speaker of the Lok Sabha
According to Article 118(4) of the Constitution of India, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides over a joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament. In the absence of the Speaker, the Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides, followed by the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha if the Deputy Speaker is also absent.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the constitutional provision governing joint sittings of Parliament.
Article 108 of the Constitution of India provides for a joint sitting of both Houses to resolve a legislative deadlock over an ordinary bill.
Understanding the context of joint sittings in the Union Legislature.
2
Determine the designated presiding authority under Article 118(4).
According to Article 118(4), the Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides over a joint sitting of both Houses.
The Speaker represents the directly elected chamber of Parliament.

Key Concept

Presiding Authority at Joint Sittings of Parliament
Question 10Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the powers, removal procedures, and functions of the Presiding Officers of the Indian Parliament:

1. The decision of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha as to whether a Bill is a Money Bill is final, and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha possesses no power or authority to certify any Bill as a Money Bill.
2. In the absence of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha presides over a joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament summoned under Article 108.
3. While the Speaker of the Lok Sabha can be removed from office by a resolution passed by an effective majority of the Lok Sabha alone, the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha can be removed only if a resolution for their removal as Vice-President is passed by an effective majority of the Rajya Sabha and agreed to by a simple majority of the Lok Sabha.
4. The decision of the Speaker regarding the disqualification of a member of the Lok Sabha under the Tenth Schedule (Anti-Defection Law) is final and completely immune from judicial review.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

Statements 1 and 3 are correct. The Chairman of the Rajya Sabha does not preside over joint sittings, and the Speaker's disqualification decisions under the Tenth Schedule are subject to judicial review.
Statements 1 and 3 accurately describe constitutional provisions. Statement 1 correctly identifies the exclusive prerogative of the Lok Sabha Speaker under Article 110(3) to certify a Money Bill. Statement 3 accurately details the removal procedure under Article 94(c) for the Speaker (effective majority of Lok Sabha) and under Article 67(b) for the Vice-President/Chairman (effective majority in Rajya Sabha accepted by simple majority in Lok Sabha). Statements 2 and 4 are false.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding Money Bill certification
Under Article 110(3) of the Constitution, if any question arises whether a Bill is a Money Bill or not, the decision of the Speaker of the House of the People is final. The Chairman of the Rajya Sabha has no such jurisdiction.
Verify constitutional powers of the Lok Sabha Speaker versus the Rajya Sabha Chairman under financial procedures.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding Joint Sitting presidency
According to the rules of procedure and Article 118(4), a joint sitting is presided over by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, or in their absence by the Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha, or in their absence by the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. The Chairman of the Rajya Sabha (Vice-President) NEVER presides over a joint sitting because they are not a Member of Parliament.
Check procedural order of precedence for Joint Sittings under Article 108 and Article 118.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding removal procedures
Under Article 94(c), the Speaker can be removed by a resolution of the Lok Sabha passed by a majority of all the then members of the House (effective majority). Under Article 67(b), the Vice-President (ex-officio Chairman of Rajya Sabha) is removed by a resolution of the Council of States passed by a majority of all the then members of the Council (effective majority) and agreed to by the House of the People (simple majority).
Examine constitutional provisions governing the removal of Lok Sabha Speaker vs Vice-President of India.
4
Evaluate Statement 4 regarding Anti-Defection Law and judicial review
In the landmark judgment Kihoto Hollohan vs Zachillhu (1992), the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court declared Paragraph 7 of the Tenth Schedule unconstitutional and held that the Speaker while deciding defection questions acts as a tribunal, making their orders subject to judicial review under Articles 136, 226, and 227.
Assess legal precedents regarding immunity under the Tenth Schedule.

Key Concept

Constitutional powers, removal mechanics, and judicial boundaries of Parliamentary Presiding Officers in India.
Question 11Question →

Match the parliamentary terms related to the functioning of the Indian Parliament in Column-I with their correct procedural descriptions in Column-II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Prorogation
Adjournment sine die
Quorum
Dissolution

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Prorogation matches with ending a session of the House by the President; Adjournment sine die matches with terminating a sitting for an indefinite period; Quorum matches with the minimum membership requirement of one-tenth to conduct business; and Dissolution matches with bringing an end to the life of the Lok Sabha.
Each parliamentary procedural term is correctly paired with its constitutionally specified definition: Prorogation terminates a session via Presidential order, Adjournment sine die suspends a sitting without a specified reassembly date via the Presiding Officer, Quorum establishes the 10% minimum attendance requirement under Article 100(3), and Dissolution terminates the tenure of the Lok Sabha.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze 'Prorogation'
Matches with terminating a session of the House by the President.
Prorogation ends an entire session, unlike an adjournment which only suspends a sitting.
2
Analyze 'Adjournment sine die'
Matches with terminating a sitting for an indefinite period.
'Sine die' literally means without fixing a day; it is exercised by the Speaker/Chairman.
3
Analyze 'Quorum'
Matches with one-tenth of total membership required to conduct proceedings.
Under Article 100(3), a sitting cannot officially take place without this minimum attendance.
4
Analyze 'Dissolution'
Matches with ending the life of the Lok Sabha.
Rajya Sabha is a permanent body not subject to dissolution, whereas Lok Sabha dissolves after its term or on presidential order.

Key Concept

Parliamentary Sittings, Sessions, and Procedural Terminology
Estimated Time:45s
Question 12Question →

With reference to the Union Legislature in India, which Article of the Constitution of India explicitly provides the legal definition of a 'Money Bill'?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Article 110

Answer

Article 110
Article 110 of the Constitution of India provides the precise definition of a Money Bill, stating that a bill is deemed to be a Money Bill if it contains only provisions dealing with taxation, custody or withdrawal from the Consolidated Fund of India, or regulation of borrowing money by the Union Government.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Recall the constitutional article that contains the definition of a Money Bill.
Article 110 of the Indian Constitution defines a Money Bill as one dealing exclusively with taxation, government borrowing, or expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India.
It is essential to distinguish between the article containing the definition (Article 110) and the article prescribing the legislative procedure (Article 109).

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions defining a Money Bill (Article 110)
Question 13Question →

Arrange the following sequential stages involved in the enactment of an Ordinary Bill in the Indian Parliament, starting from its introduction to its final stage.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological order of stages in passing an Ordinary Bill is: (1) First Reading (Introduction), (2) Second Reading (Clause-by-clause consideration), (3) Third Reading (Voting on the bill as a whole), and (4) Presidential Assent.
The standard legislative procedure in the Indian Parliament for an Ordinary Bill follows five main stages: First Reading (introduction and gazette publication), Second Reading (general discussion, committee scrutiny, and clause-by-clause consideration with amendments), Third Reading (voting on the bill as a whole), transmission to the other House for identical process, and finally, Presidential Assent under Article 111.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the initial legislative stage
The process begins with First Reading (Introduction of the Bill and publication in the official Gazette).
A bill cannot undergo debate or amendment until it is formally introduced into a House of Parliament.
2
Identify the detailed examination stage
The Second Reading involves clause-by-clause discussion and voting on proposed amendments.
This is the most critical stage where the detailed provisions of the bill are scrutinized and modified.
3
Identify the approval stage in the introducing House
The Third Reading involves voting on the Bill as a whole.
No substantive amendments are allowed at this stage; members either accept or reject the finalized text.
4
Identify the final constitutional requirement for enactment
Presentation to the President of India for assent.
Under Article 111 of the Constitution, a bill passed by Parliament becomes an Act only after receiving Presidential assent.

Key Concept

Legislative Procedure for Ordinary Bills in Indian Parliament
Question 14Question →

Which of the following represents the correct sequential order of the procedural stages involved in the presentation and enactment of the Annual Financial Statement (Budget) in the Indian Parliament, from commencement to completion?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence for the enactment of the Budget in Parliament is: Presentation of the Budget → General Discussion → Scrutiny by Departmentally Related Standing Committees → Voting on Demands for Grants → Passing of the Appropriation Bill → Passing of the Finance Bill.
The enactment of the Budget (Annual Financial Statement under Article 112) follows a strict six-stage constitutional procedure in the Indian Parliament: 1. Presentation of Budget in Lok Sabha, 2. General Discussion in both Houses, 3. Scrutiny of Demands for Grants by Departmentally Related Standing Committees (DRSCs) during recess, 4. Voting on Demands for Grants exclusively in the Lok Sabha (Article 113), 5. Passing of the Appropriation Bill (Article 114) to authorize withdrawal from the Consolidated Fund of India, and 6. Passing of the Finance Bill to legalize taxation proposals.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the initial legislative act of the financial year.
The process begins with the presentation of the Annual Financial Statement under Article 112.
The executive must lay the budget estimates before Parliament prior to any legislative deliberation.
2
Trace the initial legislative discussion and committee referral stages.
General Discussion occurs first, followed by the recess period where Departmentally Related Standing Committees scrutinize individual ministry demands.
General discussion sets the macro-economic context before committee-level micro-examination of specific grants.
3
Differentiate the voting stage and financial authorization legislation.
Lok Sabha votes on Demands for Grants, followed immediately by the passage of the Appropriation Bill, and concluding with the Finance Bill.
Expenditure authorization (Appropriation Bill under Article 114) must precede tax enactment (Finance Bill) to finalize budget completion.

Key Concept

Procedural Stages of Budget Enactment in Indian Parliament
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 15Question →

Which of the following Standing Committees of the Indian Parliament consists exclusively of members drawn from the Lok Sabha?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Committee on Estimates

Answer

The Committee on Estimates consists exclusively of 30 members elected solely from among the members of the Lok Sabha.
The Committee on Estimates is the largest committee of Parliament, consisting of 30 members who are exclusively elected from the Lok Sabha every year. Rajya Sabha members are not represented on this committee at all because it scrutinizes budget estimates prepared by government departments.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine the membership structure of Financial Standing Committees in the Indian Parliament.
Identify that while most financial committees draw members from both Houses, the Committee on Estimates is unique.
Lok Sabha exercises primary authority over financial matters, budget examination, and expenditure estimates.
2
Verify the exact numerical composition of the Committee on Estimates.
It has 30 members, and all 30 are elected from the Lok Sabha annually using single transferable vote.
Rajya Sabha has no representation in the Estimates Committee.

Key Concept

Composition of Parliamentary Financial Committees
Question 16Question →

Consider the following statements regarding Parliamentary Committees in India:

1. The Estimates Committee consists of 30 members, all of whom are elected solely from the Lok Sabha.
2. A Minister is eligible to be elected as a member of the Public Accounts Committee if nominated by the Speaker.
3. By convention, the Chairman of the Estimates Committee is invariably appointed from the main Opposition party.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 only

Answer

The statement specifying that the Estimates Committee consists of 30 members elected solely from the Lok Sabha is the only correct statement.
The statement describing the Estimates Committee as having 30 members, all elected from the Lok Sabha, is accurate. Rajya Sabha members are not included in the Estimates Committee. Ministers are barred from all three financial committees, and the Chairman of the Estimates Committee is customarily chosen from the ruling party.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine Statement 1 regarding the membership structure of the Estimates Committee.
The Estimates Committee has 30 members, and all 30 are drawn exclusively from the Lok Sabha (Rajya Sabha has no representation). Statement 1 is correct.
To evaluate the house-wise composition of the parliamentary financial committee.
2
Examine Statement 2 regarding the eligibility of Ministers for parliamentary committee membership.
A Minister cannot be elected as a member of the Public Accounts Committee, Estimates Committee, or Committee on Public Undertakings. If a member is appointed as a Minister after election to the committee, they cease to be a member from the date of such appointment. Statement 2 is incorrect.
To assess the rule of separation between executive ministers and legislative scrutiny bodies.
3
Examine Statement 3 regarding the chairmanship convention of the Estimates Committee.
The Chairman of the Estimates Committee is appointed by the Speaker from amongst its members, and by convention, is invariably drawn from the ruling party. It is the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) whose Chairman has been appointed from the Opposition party by convention since 1967. Statement 3 is incorrect.
To distinguish between leadership conventions of different financial committees.

Key Concept

Composition, restrictions on minister membership, and chairmanship conventions of Parliamentary Financial Committees.
Question 17Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the effect of the dissolution of the Lok Sabha on pending bills in the Parliament of India:

1. A bill passed by both Houses of Parliament but pending the assent of the President does not lapse.
2. A bill pending in the Rajya Sabha that has not been passed by the Lok Sabha lapses upon dissolution.
3. A bill passed by the Lok Sabha but pending in the Rajya Sabha does not lapse if the President has notified an intention to summon a joint sitting prior to the dissolution.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

The correct combination of statements is '1 and 3 only'.
Statements 1 and 3 are constitutionally accurate. Under the Indian Constitution, a bill awaiting presidential assent has passed through both legislative chambers and is unaffected by the dissolution of the lower house. Additionally, Article 108(5) explicitly protects a bill from lapsing if the President announced an intention to hold a joint sitting prior to dissolution. Conversely, statement 2 is incorrect because Article 107(4) explicitly specifies that a bill pending in the Rajya Sabha that has not been passed by the Lok Sabha does not lapse.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze statement 1 regarding bills pending presidential assent.
Statement 1 is correct. When a bill has been passed by both Houses and is awaiting assent from the President, it is no longer pending in either House. Therefore, the dissolution of the Lok Sabha does not cause it to lapse.
Article 107 applies to bills pending in the Houses. Bills awaiting presidential assent or returned by the President for reconsideration do not lapse.
2
Analyze statement 2 regarding bills originating and pending in the Rajya Sabha.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Under Article 107(4), a bill pending in the Rajya Sabha which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha does NOT lapse upon dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
Since the Lok Sabha has not yet considered or acted on the bill, the legislative process in the lower house has not officially begun for that bill.
3
Analyze statement 3 regarding joint sitting notifications prior to dissolution.
Statement 3 is correct. Under Article 108(5), if the President has notified an intention to summon a joint sitting of both Houses before the Lok Sabha is dissolved, the bill does not lapse.
The notification of a joint sitting freezes the legislative deadlock process and overrides the standard lapsing rule under Article 107(5).

Key Concept

Effect of Dissolution of Lok Sabha on Pending Parliamentary Business (Articles 107 & 108)
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 18Question →

Match the special constitutional powers and procedural functions of the Houses of Parliament in List-I with their corresponding Constitutional Provisions / Articles in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Authorization to Parliament to create one or more All-India Services
Initiation of a resolution for the removal of the Vice-President of India
Final decision and certification on whether a Bill is a Money Bill
Exclusive approval of a National Emergency proclamation when Lok Sabha is dissolved

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Authorization to create All-India Services matches Article 312; Initiation of a resolution for the removal of the Vice-President matches Article 67(b); Final decision on certifying a Money Bill matches Article 110(3); Exclusive approval of National Emergency during Lok Sabha dissolution matches Proviso to Article 352(4).
The correct pairings accurately reflect the specific constitutional balance of power between the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha: Article 312 reserves All-India Services creation resolutions to Rajya Sabha, Article 67(b) mandates that Vice-President removal resolutions originate in Rajya Sabha, Article 110(3) grants exclusive Money Bill certification powers to the Lok Sabha Speaker, and Article 352(4) proviso provides for emergency approval by Rajya Sabha when Lok Sabha stands dissolved.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the constitutional article empowering Rajya Sabha regarding All-India Services
Article 312 explicitly gives Rajya Sabha the exclusive federal power to initiate creation of All-India Services.
This federal safeguard protects state administrative cadres unless Rajya Sabha consents.
2
Examine the procedural rule for removing the Vice-President of India
Article 67(b) stipulates that a resolution for removal of the Vice-President must originate exclusively in the Rajya Sabha.
Because the Vice-President serves as the Presiding Officer of the Rajya Sabha, initiation power belongs solely to that House.
3
Determine the authority governing Money Bill certification
Article 110(3) confers unchallengeable and final authority on the Speaker of Lok Sabha to decide whether a bill is a Money Bill.
Lok Sabha holds primary financial power and accountability under the Indian parliamentary structure.
4
Analyze emergency powers when the lower house is dissolved
Under the proviso to Article 352(4), Rajya Sabha functions as the continuous constitutional watchdog approving emergency proclamations during Lok Sabha's dissolution within 30 days.
Rajya Sabha is a permanent body not subject to dissolution, maintaining legislative oversight in emergencies.

Key Concept

Exclusive and Special Powers of Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha under the Constitution of India
Question 19Question →

Match the Parliamentary Motions and Devices of the Indian Parliament in List-I with their corresponding procedural features and characteristics in List-II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Calling Attention Motion
Adjournment Motion
Privilege Motion
Censure Motion

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Calling Attention Motion matches with the Indian procedural innovation seeking an authoritative statement (right_1); Adjournment Motion matches with requiring 50 members' support and carrying an element of censure (right_2); Privilege Motion matches with being moved against a minister for withholding facts or giving distorted information (right_3); and Censure Motion matches with stating specific grounds and not mandating immediate government resignation (right_4).
Each parliamentary device has specific procedural rules defined in the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha. Calling Attention is an Indian innovation (1954). Adjournment motion requires 50 members and censures the executive. Privilege motion addresses misinforming the House. Censure motion requires specific grounds and targets specific minister actions without forcing cabinet resignation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the procedural characteristics of Calling Attention Motion.
Calling Attention Motion was introduced in Indian parliamentary rules in 1954 to seek an authoritative statement from a minister on an urgent matter.
It distinguishes itself as an indigenous procedural device unlike Point of Order or Adjournment Motion.
2
Analyze the requirements for Adjournment Motion.
It needs 50 members' support for leave, interrupts scheduled proceedings, and censures government conduct.
Adjournment motion is extraordinary and restricted to Lok Sabha due to its censure implications.
3
Differentiate between Privilege Motion and Censure Motion.
Privilege Motion focuses on breach of House rights due to misleading facts, whereas Censure Motion targets specific policy actions of a minister or cabinet without requiring cabinet resignation upon adoption.
Understanding the distinct legal and procedural objective of each device is essential.

Key Concept

Parliamentary Devices and Motions in Indian Parliament
Question 20Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the powers and procedural position of the Presiding Officers of the Houses of Parliament in India:

1. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha derives authority from three sources: the Constitution of India, the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business of Lok Sabha, and Parliamentary Conventions.
2. The determination of whether a bill is a Money Bill made by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha can be overridden by a resolution passed by a two-thirds majority in the Rajya Sabha.
3. The Chairman of the Rajya Sabha cannot preside over a joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament under any circumstances, even if both the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha are absent.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

1 and 3 only
The correct option identifies that statements 1 and 3 are correct. The Speaker of Lok Sabha derives powers from the Constitution, House rules, and conventions. In addition, the Chairman of Rajya Sabha (being the Vice-President of India and not an MP) can never preside over a joint sitting; if the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha are absent, the Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha presides. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Speaker's endorsement of a Money Bill under Article 110(3) is final and cannot be overridden by Rajya Sabha.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding the sources of authority for the Speaker of Lok Sabha.
Statement 1 is correct. The Speaker derives constitutional and procedural authority from the Constitution of India, the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business of Lok Sabha, and established Parliamentary Conventions.
Understanding the constitutional framework governing presiding officers in the Indian legislative system.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding the finality of the Speaker's endorsement of a Money Bill under Article 110(3).
Statement 2 is incorrect. Under Article 110(3) of the Constitution, if any question arises whether a Bill is a Money Bill or not, the decision of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha is final. The Rajya Sabha has no constitutional power to reject, amend, or override this certification.
Evaluating financial powers and Rajya Sabha limitations under Article 109 and Article 110.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding joint sitting presiding protocol under Article 118(4).
Statement 3 is correct. Under Article 118(4) and the Joint Sitting Rules, a joint sitting is presided over by the Speaker of Lok Sabha, or in their absence, the Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha, or in their absence, the Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha. The Chairman of Rajya Sabha (Vice-President of India) is not a member of either House of Parliament and is constitutionally barred from presiding over a joint sitting.
Applying the statutory order of precedence for presiding over joint sittings of Parliament.

Key Concept

Powers and position of Presiding Officers of Parliament (Speaker of Lok Sabha & Chairman of Rajya Sabha)
Page 1 / 2Next
Union Legislature: Parliament Structure, Lawmaking, and Committees Practice Questions — State PSC Exam | Examkin