Read the passage given below and answer the question that follows:
In recent international financial architecture discussions, the reliance on contractual innovations—specifically collective action clauses (CACs)—has been promoted as the primary mechanism to resolve sovereign debt distress without full-scale statutory bankruptcy frameworks. By permitting a qualified majority of bondholders to bind all creditors to a restructuring agreement, CACs successfully mitigate the holdout problem posed by predatory vulture funds. This market-based solution aims to prevent minor dissenters from blocking broader financial relief efforts. However, prioritizing contractual terms over comprehensive multilateral regulatory architecture overlooks structural vulnerabilities inherent in market-driven debt resolution. Sovereign debt crises in developing economies frequently stem not merely from coordination failures among private bondholders, but from uncoordinated official bilateral claims, opaque non-traditional lending practices, and systemic macroeconomic shocks. Relying solely on bond-by-bond contractual clauses fails to establish equitable burden-sharing between private creditors and state lenders, nor does it provide automatic debt standstills during exogenous emergencies. Consequently, while enhanced CACs are a necessary incremental refinement, treating contractual clauses as a substitute for an international statutory sovereign insolvency regime leaves vulnerable nations exposed to prolonged financial distress and fragmented litigation.
Which of the following statements best reflects the central thesis of the passage?
- While contractual collective action clauses offer useful incremental improvements, a formal international statutory insolvency regime is necessary to address the broader structural challenges of sovereign debt crises.Answer
- BCollective action clauses should be completely abandoned in sovereign restructuring because they fail to resolve holdout problems caused by private vulture funds.
- CRelying on contractual debt resolution is fundamentally flawed because market-driven financial systems inevitably exploit developing nations through predatory lending.
- DEstablishing an international statutory insolvency framework is impossible because sovereign states refuse to surrender economic autonomy to multilateral financial bodies.