Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumStatement and Arguments

An urban development committee is debating traffic management strategies for a rapidly growing metropolitan area.

Policy Question: Should the city administration immediately ban all private diesel vehicles from entering the central business district during peak daylight hours?

Submitted Argument: Yes, implementing this ban will instantly eradicate all forms of air and noise pollution in the city, creating a perfect living environment for all residents.

Assertion: In the context of analytical reasoning, the submitted argument is logically strong.

Answer: Answer

Answer

False, because the argument relies on hyperbolic, absolute claims rather than realistic and logically sound reasoning.
The assertion is false. A logically strong argument must present realistic, proportionate consequences directly linked to the proposed action. Claiming that a localized, part-time ban will 'instantly eradicate all forms' of pollution citywide is hyperbolic and practically impossible, rendering the argument logically weak.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core policy question
The proposal involves a targeted restriction: banning private diesel vehicles only in the central business district and only during peak hours.
Understanding the precise scope of the policy is required to evaluate the validity of the expected outcomes.
2
Evaluate the submitted argument's claims
The argument claims the ban will 'instantly eradicate all forms of air and noise pollution' and create a 'perfect living environment' across the city.
Identifying the specific language and scope of the argument reveals its logical structure.
3
Determine the logical strength of the argument
The argument is weak. While the policy would reduce some emissions, it is logically impossible for a limited ban to eliminate 'all forms' of pollution (such as industrial, non-diesel, or natural sources) or create a 'perfect' environment.
In logical reasoning, arguments that rely on extreme, disproportionate, or utopian assumptions without factual grounding are categorized as weak.
4
Evaluate the final assertion
Since the argument is weak, the assertion stating that the argument is 'logically strong' must be false.
This directly answers the true/false premise presented in the stem.

Key Concept

Evaluating the logical validity of arguments by identifying extreme claims and disproportionate assumptions.
Rate this question

Topics

Statement and Arguments

More questions from this topic