Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardUnion Executive: President, Vice-President, PM, and Council of Ministers

Which of the following statements regarding the constitutional position, immunities, and structural limits of the Union Executive in India are correct?

  1. No criminal proceedings whatsoever can be instituted or continued against the President of India in any court during the term of office.Answer
  2. B
    Civil proceedings claiming relief against the President for acts performed in a personal capacity can be instituted in a court without serving any prior written notice.
  3. Unlike the British system, there is no constitutional provision in India establishing the legal responsibility of a Minister for an official act of the President.Answer
  4. D
    The total number of ministers, including the Prime Minister, in the Union Council of Ministers cannot exceed 15 percent of the total combined strength of both Houses of Parliament.

Answer

The statements establishing that no criminal proceedings can be instituted against the President during office and that Indian ministers carry no legal responsibility for official presidential acts are correct.
The Constitution of India provides full criminal immunity to the President while in office under Article 361(2). Additionally, India follows executive responsibility to Parliament politically rather than legally; presidential acts do not require ministerial countersignature, meaning ministers cannot be sued in court for official executive acts.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Constitutional immunities of the President under Article 361.
Article 361(2) provides absolute immunity from criminal proceedings during the President's term. However, Article 361(4) requires a two-month advance written notice before initiating civil proceedings for personal acts.
To verify the rules governing criminal and civil immunity for the Head of State.
2
Examine the doctrine of legal responsibility of Ministers under Indian parliamentary democracy.
Unlike the United Kingdom, where executive orders require ministerial countersignature making ministers legally answerable in courts ('the King can do no wrong'), the Indian Constitution does not require ministerial countersignature, leaving no system of legal responsibility of ministers for presidential acts.
To contrast British cabinet conventions with Indian constitutional provisions.
3
Evaluate the statutory ceiling on the size of the Union Council of Ministers under Article 75(1A).
The 91st Constitutional Amendment Act (2003) added Article 75(1A), stipulating that the total number of ministers, including the Prime Minister, shall not exceed 15% of the total number of members of the House of the People (Lok Sabha), not both Houses of Parliament.
To verify the specific parliamentary house used for computing the maximum size of the council.

Key Concept

Constitutional Immunities of the President, System of Ministerial Responsibility, and Size Ceiling of Union Council of Ministers under Articles 75 and 361.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Union Executive: President, Vice-President, PM, and Council of Ministers

More questions from this topic