Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumStatement and Arguments

In logical reasoning analysis for public policy decision-making, an argument rejecting a proposal for mandatory rooftop rainwater harvesting in urban centers on the sole ground that 'it will require citizens to alter their routine domestic water conservation habits' is classified as a strong argument.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is False.
The statement is false because State PSC standards classify an argument as strong only when it addresses essential feasibility, severe socio-economic consequences, or core governance objectives. Objections grounded merely in minor lifestyle friction or routine administrative adjustments are logically weak.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main statement and the offered counter-argument.
The statement proposes mandatory urban rooftop rainwater harvesting, while the argument opposes it due to the need for citizens to adjust daily water conservation habits.
Evaluating logical argument strength requires isolating the core premise and comparing it against the gravity of the objection.
2
Assess the argument against standard State PSC criteria for strong versus weak arguments.
Routine habit adjustment is a minor procedural outcome and does not demonstrate significant harm, financial unfeasibility, or logical flaw in the policy.
Arguments that rely on trivial inconveniences, simple reluctance to adapt, or superficial objections are categorized as logically weak.

Key Concept

Evaluation of Strong and Weak Arguments in Administrative Reasoning
Rate this question

Topics

Statement and Arguments

More questions from this topic