Examkin

Question

Difficulty: EasyStatement and Arguments

Consider the following policy statement and argument:
Statement: Should municipal corporations mandate rooftop rainwater harvesting for all newly constructed commercial buildings?
Argument: Yes, because rainwater harvesting helps recharge depleted groundwater tables and mitigates urban flood risks during heavy monsoons.

True or False: The argument provided above is a logically strong argument.

Answer: Answer

Answer

True. The argument is logically strong as it provides a practical, relevant, and sound justification for the proposed administrative policy.
The assertion is true because the argument directly links the mandatory policy to clear, realistic, and practical administrative and environmental benefits, satisfying all conditions of a logically strong argument.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the policy statement and the proposed argument.
The statement suggests mandating rooftop rainwater harvesting in new commercial buildings, and the argument supports this by citing groundwater recharge and flood mitigation.
To evaluate whether the argument directly addresses the core objective of the statement.
2
Assess the logical relevance and practical impact of the argument.
Recharging groundwater and reducing urban flooding are well-established, practical outcomes directly resulting from rainwater harvesting structures.
A strong argument must demonstrate direct logical relevance, realistic impact, and non-trivial justification.
3
Determine the truth value of the assertion.
Since the argument meets all criteria of logical strength without using extreme statements or fallacies, the statement that it is a strong argument is True.
Concluding the true/false evaluation based on established logical standards.

Key Concept

Criteria for Strong vs. Weak Arguments in Policy Analysis
Rate this question

Topics

Statement and Arguments

More questions from this topic