Question

Difficulty: HardStatement and Assumptions

Read the following administrative circular carefully.

Statement: The State Transport Authority (STA) has issued a directive mandating that all inter-city commercial buses must be retrofitted with GPS tracking devices and driver-fatigue monitoring cameras within the next three months, failing which their route permits will be permanently revoked.

Which of the following assumptions are implicit in the given statement? (Select all that apply)

  1. A substantial number of inter-city commercial buses currently lack GPS tracking and driver-fatigue monitoring systems.Answer
  2. The threat of permanently revoking a route permit is a consequence severe enough to compel bus operators to comply with the mandate.Answer
  3. C
    The implementation of the mandate will result in a significant decrease in the frequency of road accidents involving inter-city commercial buses.
  4. D
    The financial cost of purchasing and installing the required safety devices is affordable for all commercial bus operators.

Answer

The implicit assumptions are that a substantial number of buses currently lack these devices, and that revoking route permits is a severe enough consequence to ensure compliance.
The correct options are valid assumptions because a corrective mandate logically necessitates that the problem currently exists (buses lack the devices), and the chosen enforcement mechanism logically requires the belief that the penalty will work (permit revocation compels compliance).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core action and the enforcer in the statement.
The STA is mandating safety equipment retrofitting within three months under the threat of permanent permit revocation.
Understanding the policy and its enforcement mechanism is essential to uncover the unstated premises.
2
Evaluate the first candidate assumption regarding current bus equipment.
The mandate implies that a gap exists. If all buses were already equipped, the mandate would be redundant. Thus, it is assumed many buses lack these devices.
A policy aimed at changing a condition inherently assumes that the desired condition does not already universally exist.
3
Evaluate the second candidate assumption regarding the penalty.
The STA uses permit revocation to enforce the rule, assuming this penalty is impactful enough to force operators to incur the cost of retrofitting.
Administrative mandates rely on the premise that their attached penalties are effective deterrents.
4
Evaluate the remaining candidate assumptions for logical validity.
Decreased accidents is a future intended outcome (inference), not an assumption. Affordability is an external practical consideration, not logically required by the mandate.
It is critical to distinguish between foundational premises (assumptions), expected outcomes (inferences), and real-world practicalities (external bias).

Key Concept

Distinguishing implicit premises (assumptions) from expected outcomes (inferences) and external factual biases in administrative statements.
Rate this question