Read the following passage carefully:
The unilateral implementation of Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAM) by industrialized economies is frequently framed as an essential trade instrument to mitigate 'carbon leakage' and maintain domestic competitiveness under stringent climate regulations. However, this trade-climate policy nexus introduces profound structural asymmetries for developing nations transitioning toward low-carbon economies. By levying tariffs on carbon-intensive imports based on the stringent emission standards of destination markets, such mechanisms effectively penalize developing nations that rely on fossil-fuel-intensive manufacturing due to historical capital constraints and delayed technological transfer. While proponents contend that border adjustments incentivize global decarbonization by enforcing market-based penalties on emissions, the resulting financial burden falls disproportionately on countries lacking the fiscal capacity to subsidize green energy infrastructure. Consequently, rather than fostering genuine international climate cooperation, uncoordinated tariff-based border adjustments risk transforming global environmental governance into a subtle mechanism of economic protectionism. This operational friction destabilizes multilateral consensus under international climate treaties by penalizing export-led growth in developing regions without incorporating equitable financial transfers or technological assistance.
Based on the passage above, which of the following statements correctly capture the author's central thesis regarding Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms?
- Unilateral carbon border tariffs risk turning international climate governance into economic protectionism by penalizing developing nations with limited green transition capital.Answer
- Uncoordinated trade-climate border adjustments undermine multilateral climate cooperation by penalizing export growth in developing regions without providing technological or financial assistance.Answer
- CMarket-based emission penalties should be entirely abolished because domestic climate regulations inherently fail to reduce global carbon leakage.
- DDeveloping nations should enact reciprocal retaliatory tariffs on imported green technologies to protect their domestic manufacturing sectors.