Examkin

Question

Difficulty: EasyStatement and Arguments

Given below is a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II.

Statement: Should government primary schools introduce a mandatory 30-minute daily physical activity session for all students?

Arguments:
I. Yes; regular physical exercise enhances physical health, mental alertness, and cognitive development in growing children.
II. No; engaging in daily physical activities will completely destroy students' interest in academic subjects.

Which of the following evaluations regarding the strength of the arguments is correct?

  1. Only argument I is strongAnswer
  2. B
    Only argument II is strong
  3. C
    Neither argument I nor II is strong
  4. D
    Both argument I and II are strong

Answer

Only argument I is strong
The evaluation stating that only argument I is strong is correct because Argument I offers a practical, logically sound, and directly relevant justification. In contrast, Argument II relies on an extreme and baseless claim that physical activity eliminates academic interest.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Argument I for relevance and logical strength.
Argument I is strong.
It directly connects mandatory physical activity to well-documented benefits in physical health and cognitive development.
2
Evaluate Argument II for logical consistency and realistic outcomes.
Argument II is weak.
It uses an extreme, unsupported claim that physical activity completely destroys interest in academic learning.
3
Select the option corresponding to the accurate evaluation.
The option stating that only argument I is strong is the correct evaluation.
Only Argument I satisfies the criteria for a logically strong argument.

Key Concept

Evaluating the strength of arguments based on logical relevance, practical benefits, and avoidance of extreme generalizations.
Rate this question

Topics

Statement and Arguments

More questions from this topic